Wednesday, February 29, 2012 - 6:53 PM
The U.S. government has worked hard to find a new location in Iraq for the thousands of members of the Iranian dissident group Mujahedeen e-Khalq (MEK), a State Department-designated foreign terrorist organization that is being kicked out of its home at Camp Ashraf by the Iraqi government.
But now the State Department has to answer aggressive charges that the new home for the MEK, a former U.S. military base called Camp Liberty, is a "concentration camp" with horrid conditions. What's more, these charges are coming from senior U.S. politicians and experts, led by former New York mayor and presidential candidate Rudi Giuliani.
"This is not a relocation camp. I have seen relocation camps. I know what relocation camps look like. And I know what jails look like. This isn't a jail. This is a concentration camp. That's what it is. This is a concentration camp. Let's call it what it is," Giuliani said at a Feb. 26 "conference" held under the rubric of something called the Global Initiative for Democracy, an advocacy group that seems to be very interested in the MEK issue.
"This is worse than any facility I've ever seen having been at one time in charge of the Federal Bureau of Prisons and another time responsible for the New York City jail system, Rikers Island, materially better than this. This is a concentration camp."
The State Department worked with the United Nations to prepare Camp Liberty, now renamed Camp Hurriya (Arabic for "freedom"), to get it ready for the MEK, but the MEK has been reluctant to move there. The first tranche of about 400 MEK members started relocating this month.
Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz, who was on the panel with Guliani at the Feb. 26 conference, wholeheartedly agreed with his take on the conditions at Camp Liberty, according to a press release put out by the Global Initiative for Democracy.
"This is a scandal. This is a fraud; a fraud not involving money, but a fraud involving threats to human life. What we need immediately is a commission of inquiry to determine how this fraud was perpetrated," Dershowitz said. "Who certified, who approved that hell hole, that garbage dump? Who said that it met United Nations standards? Somebody is responsible for perpetrating that fraud and for getting 400 innocent people to risk their lives and their health to be exposed to that kind of trash and that kind of hazard to their health. We have to get to the bottom of this."
Neither man ever called Camp Liberty a "concentration camp" or a "garbage dump" when it housed hundreds of U.S. soldiers for years during the Iraq war.
Also on that panel were several former high-ranking officials who have been on the roster of the MEK's often-paid supporters in Washington, including former Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge, Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean, and former Deputy National Intelligence Officer for Transnational Threats on the National Intelligence Council Glenn Carle.
Other speakers at the conference included former Chicago Mayor Richard Daley, former U.S. Ambassador to the UK Philip Lader, and former policy advisor at the Treasury Department's office of terrorism and financial intelligence Avi Jorisch.
Reps. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) and Ted Poe (R-TX) both questioned Secretary of State Hillary Clinton about the MEK at Wednesday's hearing of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, with Poe directly raising Guliani's accusation that the new location amounted to a "concentration camp."
Clinton didn't comment on the "concentration camp" charge and simply emphasized that the U.S. was working hard to safely relocate the MEK to Camp Liberty, keep the Iraqi government from harassing the MEK, and ensure that the U.N. monitors the camp and provides help for refugees. She also said that if the MEK really wants off the list of foreign terrorist organizations (FTO), it should get with the program at Camp Liberty.
"Congressman, given the ongoing efforts to relocate the residents, MEK cooperation in the successful and peaceful closure of Camp Ashraf, the MEK's main paramilitary base, will be a key factor in any decision regarding the MEK's FTO status," Clinton said.
How clearly bought they are. The MEK are a terrorist group, no amount of lobbying changes that. Simply because they want to fight the Iranian regime, a huge number of neo-cons and hawks have been supporting them. We played that game once, with Bin Laden in Afghanistan. Short term interests may line up but long term ones rarely do.
I was a civilian contractor in Iraq during 2007. I spent time in Liberty, Slayer and Victory among many others.
I agree with the sentiment where if it was good enough for me, it is just fine for MEK to be housed there.
It's so amusing, at the expense of others, that U.S. politicians, and folks like Giuliani and Dershowitz all have the luxury of talking and complaining about the base being a "concentration camp" or about the horrid conditions. Hey, here is an idea: why don't you stop complaining about the crappy conditions there and fund renovations and make it habitable? Shocker, I know, what a naive concept. However, these folks would rather hold panel after panel to talk about how bad former Liberty is, rather than actually taking physical action. How about Rudi and Alan bring some hammers and a paint brush to Iraq and roll up their sleeves?
The real problem isn't the living conditions (because from what I'm told the current living conditions aren't any better), but the fact none of these smart folks have come up with a better solution to the problem that no one wants the MEK, and the MEK doesn't want anyone else. You could put the MEK in the Ritz Carlton and the underlying problem of what to do with the MEK still remains. How about the smart guys like Alan and Rudi figure that one out, and stop worrying about moving them from one crappy location to another crappy location.
As I was having my morning coffee this morning I started thinking of the tirade that “Reverend” Wright when into in his “church:” in 2003, asking God to damn the United States of KKK.
Please watch the short video below, paying particular attention to the reference to “they”, and then see if you can clear up a few things for me, concerning this tirade:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwQWuQVE6sw
Wright constantly refers to “they” in his tirade, but does not specify who “they” are. Could it be the Mexicans, Viet Namese, Chinese, American Indians, or maybe even the white people? He seems to have a strong hate for these people, whoever they are, to the point of being prejudiced against them. His cheering mob apparently has the same hate for this group, judging from the reaction they showed to what he said.
If a person sat in this “church” for 20 years listening to this hate speech, and later became president of the United States, would it be a stretch to assume that he still hated this group. I have always thought that the President was supposed to be the President of all the people, but if he hated a certain group of the society, could he be expected to give them the same treatment as other people, would he nominate anyone from this group to the Supreme Court, and if he wished for God to damn the United States of America, could he be expected to act in the best interest of the country?
If you can answer any of the above questions, please do so, for I am somewhat worried about it.
We worry so much about terrorism outside of the united states but fail to keep track of the terrorists we have inside of the USA. George Orwell had it right with his book 1984 because now we have Google working with the state department keeping tabs on our behavior and where our attention is focused, and the same companies that create guns also create security cameras for our homes. Who do you think looks through these cameras?? Stop giving up your freedom by getting distracted with whats going on outside of our own beloved country!
You would think that that would be a concern. Yet our current president as well as our last one have no idea at all as to the constitutional restraints on government, and they still got elected..
"Is rio orange war always comparateur forfait inevitable ?"
MaximB
(6)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE