Posted By Josh Rogin Share

President Barack Obama will deliver remarks at the AIPAC conference March 4, one day before he sits down with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House, a reprise of the difficult meeting they held there last year.

"We are pleased to announce that the president will address this year's annual AIPAC policy conference in Washington, D.C., on Sunday March 4. The president welcomes this opportunity to speak to the strengths of the special bonds between Israel and the United States," White House spokesman Jay Carney said Tuesday.

He confirmed that Obama and Netanyahu will meet March 5. The order of events will be opposite of last year, when Obama spoke the day after his tense and awkward meeting with Netanyahu in the Oval Office, where Netanyahu appeared to lecture Obama on Israeli security.

Obama will speak to AIPAC Sunday morning, the two leaders will meet Monday, and then Netanyahu will address the conference Monday evening.

Netanyahu and Israeli President Shimon Peres will speak at AIPAC, along with House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI), Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-GA), President of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and former member of Congress Jane Harman, CNN Contributor Paul Begala, Democratic strategist Donna Brazile, Fox News contributor Liz Cheney, and editor of The Weekly Standard William Kristol.

Carney also commented on the visit of National Security Advisor Tom Donilon to Israel this past weekend, where he met with Netanyahu and a host of other senior Israeli officials, including National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror, who coordinates the Iran portfolio, Mossad chief Tamir Pardo, Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz, and Military Intelligence head Aviv Kochavi.

Carney didn't say explicitly that Donilon asked the Israelis to hold off on attacking Iran, but his message was along those lines.

"The president has said -- that there is time and space for diplomacy to work, for the effect of sanctions to result in a change in Iranian behavior, an agreement by Iran to live up to its obligations, to engage in negotiations and resolve this matter peacefully," said Carney. "We do not, of course, as we've said many times, take any option off the table.  And that was the context of the discussions that Mr. Donilon had with his counterparts in Israel."

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has declined to deny the Washinton Post report that he believes Israel is planning to attack Iran in the April-May-June timeframe.

According to readouts of the Donilon meetings in the Israeli press, Netanyahu and other Israeli officials told Donilon they were displeased with the Obama administration's recent press outreach regarding Iran, especially the Feb. 19 CNN interview given by Joint Chiefs' Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey, during which Dempsey warned that the risk of Iranian retaliation for an Israeli strike on Iran would outweigh the benefits.

"That's the question with which we all wrestle, and the reason that we think that it's not prudent at this point to decide to attack Iran. I mean, that's been our counsel to our allies, the Israelis, well-known, well-documented," Dempsey said. "And we also know -- or believe we know -- that the Iranian regime has not decided that they will embark on the effort to weaponize their nuclear capability."

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper is expected to arrive in Israel Feb. 23 for a range of meetings.

 

ANTIMKO

1:21 AM ET

February 22, 2012

Pandering to the almighty Israel!

Like slaves pandering to their masters. We have become a nation of slaves. George Washington would not approve.

 

THOMAS PAINE V2

3:21 AM ET

February 22, 2012

Pandering?

Between actively campaigning for Israel to not attack Iran (when they would dearly love to) and suggesting the 1967 borders as a starting point for negotiations with Palestine, I think it's silly to say we are pandering to Israel at this time.

This is policy lead by Obama, compare that to the anything for Israel line being fed to crowds by all the GOP candidates (except Ron Paul). AIPIC does have a lot of sway in American politics so in that context consider what a bold (and smart IMHO) approach this is by our current president.

I'm all for continued friendship with Israel, however if they continue on a path that only leads to more expansionism, war and hate and never towards any resolution, I'd prefer we as a nation don't follow.

 

LEONIDASLEONIDAS

5:14 PM ET

February 22, 2012

Thomas

What expansionism are you talking about?

Israel withdrew from the Sinai Peninsula in exchange for peace with Egypt.
Israel withdrew from Suthern Lebanon - only to be reciprocated by Hezbollah attacks.
Israel withdrew from Gaza - only to be reciprocated by Hamas rockets.
And on two separate occassions (the last one in 2009 between Olmert and Abbas), Israel offered practically 100% of the West Bank to the Palestinians.
(Abbas, of course, never gave an answer to Olmert's proposal.)

 

JFAIR

8:41 PM ET

February 22, 2012

You forgot to mention the

You forgot to mention the west bank, filled with millions of indigenous Arabs and Israeli settelers.

 

JOHNBOY4546

6:50 AM ET

February 22, 2012

Why bother?

The crowd at AIPAC take their queue from Netanyahu, not from Obama.

And there is no doubt whatsoever that the vibe that Bibi puts out is that it's "anyone but Obama for me!".

So why does Obama bother, since he has not the slightest chance of eliciting any support from anyone by appearing at AIPAC.

 

LEONIDASLEONIDAS

5:18 PM ET

February 22, 2012

As might be expected

The usual Anti-Israel crowd is already ranting here in full force.

Those Evil Jews control the world!

Looks like a gathering of Walt's little fan club.

 

HURRICANEWARNING

7:28 PM ET

February 22, 2012

Leonidasleonidas

while I don't agree with much of what the standard Israel Bashers here say, I ALSO don't agree with the closed mindedness of the Pro-Israel crowd here. If we're being honest, I think it's safe to say that Israel hasn't been the best ally to the US. Now, looking from the other side, the US might not be an ideal ally either, but certainly Israel would not exist without the US's historical help. Given all that, Israel continuously degrades our position in the international world. Running false flag operations disguised as Americans in Iran (reported in every major newspaper). Selling Americas defense secrets to the Chinese. Continuously spying on, and intervening in American politics, like thats wat they should be spending their time doing, and like we should care what they think. I love jewish people, I have absolutely nothing against them whatsoever. They are a deep part of the American story. BUT, Israel has become a very hard country to remain allies with. I just don't see the direct benefit to the US is all. Please explain to me why we need Israel. I mean, I KNOW why Israel needs us. I just don't see why all the trouble we get in because of our support for Israel is worth it. Why can't we just treat Israel like every other country? Oh...right....religious nutters.

 

CHARLTONEDGAR

5:36 PM ET

March 21, 2012

This is policy lead by Obama,

This is policy lead by Obama, compare that to the anything for Israel line being fed to crowds by all the GOP candidates (except Ron Paul). AIPIC does babyblog have a lot of sway in American politics so in that context consider what a bold (and smart IMHO) approach this is by our current president. I'm all for continued friendship with Israel, however if they continue on a path that only leads to more expansionism, war and hate and never towards any resolution, I'd prefer we as a nation don't follow.

 

MAXIMB

8:27 PM ET

March 22, 2012

Having had several Canadian

Having had several Canadian friends while in the military, I have come to believe that if you want a passing grade, you must answer this question in a negative manner and slander anyone who disagrees..

"Is rio orange war always forfait b and you inevitable ?"
MaximB

 

John Hudson reports on national security and foreign policy from the Pentagon to Foggy Bottom, the White House to Embassy Row, for The Cable.

Enter your email address to get The Cable delivered to your inbox each night:

Delivered by FeedBurner