The fight over foreign aid to Lebanon may be reaching a tipping point due to the formation of a new Lebanese government that is dominated by the terrorist organization Hezbollah and its allies.

Congress has gone back and forth over whether to keep sending cash and equipment to the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF), particularly following a clash between the Israeli army and the LAF along the Israel-Lebanon border in August 2010 that left five people dead. Now Howard Berman (D-CA), the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, is pushing a bill to end almost all U.S. assistance to Lebanon. He's joined by the top Lebanese-Americans in Congress, including Darrell Issa (R-CA), Charles Boustany (R-LA), and Nick Rahall (D-WV). 

His bill, the Hezbollah Anti-Terrorism Act (HATA), is modeled on Palestinian Anti-Terrorism Act (PATA) that Congress passed after Hamas won the 2006 elections to the Palestinian Legislative Council.

"When there is essentially a government in Lebanon where a militia organization that has a political front and that is on our terrorist list is determining the nature of that government, the fundamental nature of Lebanon changes very much, from an election-based democracy into a different kind of country," Berman said in a Friday afternoon interview with The Cable.

"Under those situations, with limited exceptions, I don't think American taxpayers should be providing military or economic assistance to help Hezbollah maintain its grip on the government of Lebanon," he added.

Berman had put a hold on assistance to Lebanon last summer, but later allowed the money to go through because he wanted to strengthen the LAF in its internal struggle against Hezbollah. But now the situation is totally different and he won't back off, he said.

"The notion that the LAF will remain an island of independence under a government that is dominated and welded together by Hezbollah is a very different proposition," he said.

Berman's bill would still allow support for rule of law and democracy programs, educational funding, and even training of Lebanese forces in America under the IMET program. The president would also be able to waive restrictions in the law in cases that were deemed to be in the national security interests of the U.S.

His GOP counterpart, HFAC chairman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) is generally supportive of the idea and is considering supporting the bill, Berman said.

But what about the notion that Iran will be more than happy to make up any deficit caused by the withdrawal of U.S. aid?

"Iran has been supplying Hezbollah for years. This is not a fear, this is a reality. We have to respond to this reality and I think this is the way to do it," Berman said.

He released a summary of the legislation, which could come up as a free-standing bill or as an amendment to a larger piece of legislation.

 

ALI HAMDAN

4:45 AM ET

June 18, 2011

Except that Hezbollah is not

Except that Hezbollah is not "determining the nature of that government, [such that] the fundamental nature of Lebanon changes very much, from an election-based democracy into a different kind of country." Nothing structural has changed - Hezbollah toppled the Hariri coalition through totally legal means, and formed a new gov't in similar fashion. To be honest, it doesn't even have as directly powerful a say in cabinet as it probably could.

Hezbollah may not be the friendliest (or most clean-shaven) of political parties on the Lebanese scene, but they are certainly not the only unfriendly bunch out there. They also have proven - for instance, in the last Lebanese parliamentary and municipal elections - that they would accept election results, even if they did not favor them. All of this, on top of the commonplace practice of bribery, vote-rigging and threats.

No, Hezbollah's influence in this current gov't is just that - influence, albeit more. The Lebanon that Congressman Berman is suffocating is the same chaotic, gridlocked Lebanon that swept Hariri into power. Surprisingly like the US, politics in Lebanon is a lot like a fast-moving, unforgiving pendulum.

 

PAPICEK

2:39 PM ET

June 21, 2011

Berman's proposal...

is a knee-jerk reaction. He's not the most thoughtful player in the US foreign policy chain.

ALI HAMDAN's point is well taken. Elections will inevitably bring the nationalists and culture warriors to the fore, but this in no way diminishes the fact that these are democratically elected parties, and, after all, we have our own history of "America-First." With Berman, though, this is moot. Anything that hints of Iran, Hezboullah or Hamas will draw an immediate and strident response from Berman. Support Hezboullah? I don't think we should either, but i also do not feel we should stand so steadfastly in Israel's corner, either, and that's where Berman and I part ways.

He wants the US to support Israel like it's our 51st (but most important) state.

 

Josh Rogin reports on national security and foreign policy from the Pentagon to Foggy Bottom, the White House to Embassy Row, for The Cable.

Read More

Enter your email address to get The Cable delivered to your inbox each night:

Delivered by FeedBurner