Thursday, June 16, 2011 - 5:02 PM
Congressmen are not happy about the White House's new argument that the Libya intervention doesn't rise to the level of "hostilities" and therefore doesn't come under the jurisdiction of the War Powers Resolution.
Sen. Richard Lugar (R-IN), the Senate Foreign Relations Committee's ranking Republican, sent a letter to chairman John Kerry (D-MA) on Thursday morning asking for a hearing on the matter and Kerry responded that he supported the idea, a Lugar aide told The Cable. Lugar wants the State Department's top lawyer, Harold Koh, to testify. June 28 is the likely date for the hearing, the Lugar aide said.
SFRC spokesman Frederick Jones told The Cable that no firm date has been set, but that Kerry was working on it.
"The Foreign Relations Committee has debated the Libyan action at several hearings over the last two months. The committee held a hearing on the War Powers Resolution last Congress. In conjunction with Sen. Richard Lugar, the Committee's ranking Republican, Chairman Kerry is working to schedule a hearing later this month to address the issue," said Jones.
Suffice it to say that Lugar is not happy with the administration's claim that the War Powers Resolution does not apply to the Libya intervention.
"The Administration's position is both legally dubious and unwise. The United States is playing a central and indispensable role in military operations that have no end in sight. The Administration estimates that the cost of these operations will exceed $1 billion by September," Lugar said in a statement on Thursday. "Military operations of this significance, with far reaching consequences on our military, security and relations with other nations, require the clear support of the American people. For this reason, our Constitution provides that powers related to the use of military force are shared between the President and Congress."
In a conference call with reporters on Wednesday afternoon, White House Counsel Bob Bauer said that the administration will argue that military intervention in Libya is not subject to that law, due to the limited nature of the U.S. role in the conflict.
"Our view is even in the absence of the authorization we are operating consistent with the resolution," Bauer said in response to a question from The Cable. "We are now in a position where we are operating in a support role. We are not engaged in the any of the activities that typically over the years in War Powers analysis has considered to constitute hostilities within the meaning of the statute."
Other senior Republicans who aren't buying that argument include House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) and Senate Armed Services Committee ranking Republican John McCain (R-AZ), who said on Thursday that "The administration made an announcement that will strike most of my colleagues as a confusing breach of common sense."
But while Lugar is against the military intervention in Libya, McCain supports it. However, his efforts with Kerry to craft a resolution endorsing the action have yet to surface in Congress. Meanwhile, 10 House members are suing the administration under the War Powers Resolution, and various efforts to defund the Libya war are underway in the lower chamber.
"The result of all this, I hate to say, is plain in the actions of our colleagues on the other side of the Capitol in the House," McCain said. "The accumulated consequences of all this delay, confusion and obfuscation has been a wholesale revolt in Congress against the administration's policy."
glad to hear that a hearing is coming...
but there has been nothing but legal dubiousness regarding the War Powers Resolution, perhaps none more so that Ronald Reagan's 5 year naval "training exercise" which amounted to a blockade of Nicaragua.
Lawyers Lost To Obama In Libya War Policy Debate
by Charlie Savage, New York Times, June 18, 2011
"President Obama rejected the views of top lawyers at the Pentagon and the Justice Department when he decided that he had the legal authority to continue American military participation in the air war in Libya without Congressional authorization, according to officials familiar with internal administration deliberations. Under the War Powers Resolution, that would have required Mr. Obama to terminate or scale back the mission after May 20. Presidents have the legal authority to override the legal conclusions of the Office of Legal Counsel and to act in a manner that is contrary to its advice, but it is extraordinarily rare for that to happen. Under normal circumstances, the office’s interpretation of the law is legally binding on the executive branch."
Josh Rogin reports on national security and foreign policy from the Pentagon to Foggy Bottom, the White House to Embassy Row, for The Cable.
Read More
(2)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE