Monday, May 23, 2011 - 6:52 PM
President Barack Obama announced $2 billion in new aid to Egypt in his May 19 speech on the Middle East, but top appropriators in the House said on Monday that they don't support giving the money to any government that includes the Muslim Brotherhood.
House Appropriations State and Foreign Ops subcommittee chairwoman Kay Granger (R-TX) and ranking Democrat Nita Lowey (D-NY) spoke at a Monday afternoon panel at the AIPAC policy conference in Washington. Asked by The Cable if they supported Obama's new aid initiative to Egypt, especially if the Muslim Brotherhood sees increased power as part of an elected government, Granger said, "The answer for me is no. I don't approve of it."
The crowd erupted in applause.
"Who is the new Egyptian government? We don't know. That's the problem," Granger went on.
"Because it was a bottom-up uprising, we don't have the organization, we don't have the parties, we don't have what it takes to win an election. The Muslim Brotherhood does, because they've been there so long. So they have the opportunity to take a much larger position in the government that they had before," she said. "We have got to watch it, and we have to be very, very careful about giving over money to a government, and we don't know what that government is."
The issue of foreign assistance to Egypt was part of a larger discussion about funding emerging democracies that include elements hostile to U.S. interests. Granger and Lowey, for example, promised that no U.S. money would go to a Palestinian unity government that includes Hamas.
Lowey said that she supported using the money to build Egyptian democracy, but emphasized that Congress was not going to appropriate it and Obama would have to find it somewhere else.
In his May 19 speech, Obama promised to relieve $1 billion of Egypt's debt, and also guarantee another $1 billion in loans that he said is needed "to finance infrastructure and job creation."
"We are not going to appropriate this money to the Egyptian government," said Lowey. "We are currently giving them billions of dollars in military aid and we're going to have to see about that as well," she said.
"That is not new money. That money is coming from multilateral banks, money that's been appropriated... it's not just U.S.," she said. "For the sake of the other cuts in the budget, we don't want it to be new money."
On May 18, a senior administration official provided details of the funding plan, which called for the United States to provide Egypt with the equivalent of $2 billion over several years, as well as billions more from international institutions.
"We anticipate that the debt swap, both relief of debt and the investments that would ensue, would amount to roughly a billion over a few years and that the loan guarantees would support roughly an additional billion," the official said. "There will be additional financing coming from the multilateral development banks as well, several billion dollars."
As for the overall funding picture for foreign aid, Lowey said that appropriators are expecting a $5 billion cut from the president's request in 2012.
Granger criticized the cuts made in the 2011 budget.
"It was a big mistake that they cut foreign operations," she said. "It is going to be a very, very tough year."
Amazing. I wonder how many nations are so good at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
Because cutting off US aid to two key foreign policy centers--Egypt and Palestine--, thus eliminating any last shred of US influence, is stratgic genius. That's what you get for having Israeli puppets in Congress.
First, Assuming the people of Egypt practiced a decent and flawless election process and a parliament, government, president which is representing people demands. And among those demands was anti-Israel policy.
"Democracy is a form of government in which all citizens have an equal say in the decisions that affect their lives.", Isn't it?
Isn't this the definition you preach?
Isn't attaching "loans" to internal politics, while preaching democracy is a hypocrisy.
I urge House Appropriations State and Foreign Ops Subcommittee to stand up for that.
The time of solving Israel problems with Egypt by phone is over.
The era of buying assurances for Israel with aids and loans is over too.
As an Egyptian I rather be free and starve.
Second,
Why the DC politicians like invent a threat and start to promote it. Why they listen to the political academics who claim they know remotely Egypt.
Third,
Muslim Brotherhoods may gain positive publicity with such stance propagating in the Egyptian media.
Last,
Typical Egyptian voters, who create 70% of the voting population, who have no prior political orientation, who crave for freedom and dignified life will never vote for Muslim Brotherhoods.
Josh Rogin reports on national security and foreign policy from the Pentagon to Foggy Bottom, the White House to Embassy Row, for The Cable.
Read More
(3)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE