The Cable

Eric Cantor wants YOU to cut the defense budget

With the United States embroiled in three wars and global instability on the rise, the House GOP is entrenched in an internal battle over whether to push for cuts to the defense budget next year. The battle pits the head of the Armed Services Committee against Tea Party freshmen, with the House GOP leadership caught squarely in the middle.

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) is making an effort this week to prove he is taking a hard look at scrubbing the defense budget. His weekly online contest YouCut, which asks the public to vote by text message for the spending cut Congress should bring to a vote each week, now features three budget cutting options that would take money out of the Pentagon's coffers.

One option would cut the Pentagon's printing budget by 10 percent, allegedly saving $180 million over five years. Option number two would cut the budget for Pentagon studies and analysis, with the goal of saving $120 million over five years. The third option would deny pay raises to Pentagon employees who receive bad performance evaluations, allegedly saving $80 million from fiscal 2012 through fiscal 2016.

The three defense cuts were written by freshman GOP Rep. Allen West (R-FL), the former Army lieutenant colonel in Iraq who resigned amid an investigation into a prisoner interrogation. West is now a leading voice on military matters for Tea Party-supported fiscal hawks, who are punching above their weight in the ongoing budget struggle.

House Armed Services Committee chairman Buck McKeon (R-CA) also supports West's goal of cutting wasteful spending from the defense budget. But the two congressmen are on opposing sides of the larger fight over the defense budget, and Cantor is stuck right in the middle.

Asked if he supported overall defense cuts, West said, "I think you have to. I think that nothing can be sacrosanct." McKeon, on the other hand, sent a letter to House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) on March 10, which was also signed by 29 other congressmen, arguing that "We should not jeopardize the security of the nation by accepting across the board cuts to national defense without regard to inherent strategic risks."

The House Republican's bill for funding the Pentagon for the rest of fiscal 2011, which McKeon ultimately voted for, would cut $16 billion from the Defense Department's request for funding -- cuts Defense Secretary Robert Gates has repeatedly said would be devastating for the military.

But even though that funding hasn't been disbursed, the House GOP is also debating internally whether to cut the president's fiscal 2012 request for the Pentagon, which totals $670.6 billion. The overall figure includes $553 billion for the base budget and $117.8 billion for overseas operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.

GOP Budget Committee chairman Paul Ryan (R-IL) gets to make that call next week when he unveils the House GOP's initial fiscal 2012 spending levels. We're told by three Hill sources that Ryan will propose a Pentagon funding level exactly equal to the president's request, taking neither the side of the defense hawks or the Tea Party defense cutters.

Tom Donnelly, director of the Center for Military Studies at the American Enterprise Institute, told The Cable that Ryan's proposal will only be the beginning of the debate inside the GOP. Both sides are already preparing to propose amendments to raise or lower the Pentagon's budget.

The GOP leadership is just trying to placate both sides, according to Donnelly.

"They don't want another week's worth of stories about how they don't have control of their own party. They don't have strong feelings one way or the other," he said.

McKeon and his allies are on the defensive because they saw their deal with the GOP House leadership regarding the fiscal 2011 budget evaporate.

"Essentially McKeon and the leadership got ambushed by the RSC [Republican Study Committee] and Tea Party libertarian types," said Donnelly. "McKeon thought he had everything squared away with leadership but leadership couldn't hold the line."

The stakes are higher for 2012, because the GOP's presidential candidates will also want to weigh in.

"Let's also think about this in the context of the 2012 election: Do we really want to be weaker than Obama on national defense?" Donnelly asked. "It's a real concern for a range of presidential candidates."

NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images

The Cable

State Department: Ivory Coast and Libya call for different methods of intervention

 

As Washington focuses its attention on the international military intervention in Libya, a top State Department official emphasized that the tragedy unfolding in the Ivory Coast has not been forgotten. But an armed intervention similar to the Libya war is not called for, he said.

"The international community has intervened in the Ivory Coast, and that intervention is showing results," Assistant Secretary of State Johnnie Carson told reporters at the State Department on Thursday. "Let me just say that there are some 11,000 U.N. peacekeepers on the ground in the Ivory Coast.  They are supplemented by French military units that are a part of that U.N. peacekeeping force."

But unlike Libya, the forces controlled by Ivory Coast leader Laurent Gbagbo, who has refused to step down from power after he lost the November 2010 presidential election, "[do] not have helicopter gunships, jet aviation, or tanks in the numbers that we have seen" in Libya, Carson said.

"This is not to say that there is not a humanitarian crisis in the Ivory Coast; there is," said Carson. "We're concerned about this. We're concerned about the hundred thousand Ivoirians that have already left and gone to Liberia. But there is a difference between the two countries."

Carson also highlighted Wednesday's U.N. Security Council resolution imposing sanctions on Gbagbo, his wife, and his children.

Carson rejected the criticism that the Obama administration hasn't been active in the Ivory Coast issue.

"President Obama has been directly involved, Secretary Clinton has been directly involved, Deputy Secretary Jim Steinberg has been involved, I have been involved and our Ambassador in the region," he said. "Sometimes our political influence is as significant as what we put on the ground with respect to military might."

Carson also said that the forces loyal to Alassane Ouattara, who is widely recognized by the international community as the winner of the election, had made substantial gains throughout the southern part of the country. Ouattara's forces have captured the city of San Pedro and the capital of the country, Yamoussoukro. Today, they reached the outskirts of Abidjan, the country's largest city.

"There is a clear indication that the military forces of Gbagbo have, in fact, started to disintegrate.  The rapid pace at which Alassane Ouattara's forces have been able to move across the country from east to west and up to Abidjan suggest that there have been widespread desertions in the Gbagbo forces," Carson said.

Gbagbo can still do the right thing and hand over power before defeated, Carson emphasized. "He does have an opportunity, but that opportunity is slipping away."

Obama made a video for the people of the Ivory Coast last week, where he said, "They eyes of the world are on Cote D'Ivoire...It's time for democracy in Cote D'Ivoire, and those who choose that path will find a friend and a partner in the United States of America."