The Cable

Landrieu: Lew can stew

Jack Lew, President Obama's nominee to be the next head of the White House's Office of Management and Budget, isn't getting confirmed any time soon, according to the Democratic senator holding up his nomination.

Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA) said Tuesday that she will continue to use her hold on Lew's nomination as leverage to try to get the administration to expedite drilling permits in the Gulf of Mexico. She also admitted that, although her hold has been in place since Lew was nominated in July, her strategy hasn't worked yet.

"I'm not seeing the kind of progress on permitting that I need to lift the hold," Landrieu told reporters at the Capitol building on Tuesday. "But this is the only thing that I have found that can actually get the attention of this administration in a way that might result in getting permits in the Gulf."

The nomination of Lew, who is still serving as deputy secretary of state for management, is not directly related to the drilling issue at all, she said. And she has no problem with Lew himself.

"It has nothing to do with Jack Lew. I would support Jack Lew under normal circumstances," said Landrieu. "It's the only way I think I might be able to get the administration's attention, everything else has failed."

She said the administration needs to make it clear what it is expecting of the energy industry, and set regulations that won't keep being changed or updated.

"Punish BP, don't punish Shell, Chevron, and everybody else for what this one company did. And if you're going to wait until industry has every 'I' dotted and 't' crossed… before you can let the drilling move forward, we are going to be waiting for two or three years."

When asked by The Cable if she has considered the damage done to the White House's effort to construct a budget due to a lack of an OMB director, Landrieu said that's not her problem.

"You would think they would care enough about that to get permits issued in the Gulf," she said.


The Cable

Coburn to McCain: Cutting defense is not 'isolationist'

Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) Tuesday rejected the assertion by Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) that calls for cuts in defense spending represent the rise of "protectionism and isolationism" within the Republican party.

At a conference Monday at the Foreign Policy Initiative, a conservative think tank, McCain said that he was worried about divisions within the Republican Party on the issue of defense spending.

"I worry a lot," McCain said. "Because throughout the history of the Republican Party in modern times, there's been, obviously, as we know, two wings: The isolationist wing, manifested before World War II and at other times; and the internationalist side. And so I think there are going to be some tensions within our party."

McCain then singled out Senator-elect Rand Paul (R-KY) as an example of the party's isolationist wing. While McCain said he "respects" Paul, he criticized him for openly calling for trimming the defense budget. "Already he has talked about withdrawals from, or cuts in defense, et cetera. And a number of others are... So I worry a lot about the rise of protectionism and isolationism in the Republican Party."

The Cable couldn't reach Paul today so we caught up with Coburn, one of the only GOP senators to openly call for cuts in defense spending. Coburn said McCain was flat wrong in saying that cutting defense is an indication of isolationism.

"It's not hard to cut the defense budget and keep our defense exactly where it is," Coburn told The Cable. "That's how much waste is over there. Nothing is sacrosanct, it can't be. As a matter of fact, the way the Defense Department is run now, we're actually getting less bang for the buck. If we trim it down, we'll get more bang for the buck."

Paul told ABC's This Week on Nov. 7 that he would "absolutely" vote for cuts in military spending if such a vote was put before him. "You need ... compromise on where the spending cuts come from," Paul told ABC's Christiane Amanpour. "Republicans traditionally say, oh, we'll cut domestic spending, but we won't touch the military. The liberals -- the ones who are good -- will say, oh, we'll cut the military, but we won't cut domestic spending... Bottom line is, you have to look at everything across the board."

UPDATE: Senator McCain called in to The Cable to clarify his remarks about Afghanistan, defense spending, and Rand Paul. McCain said his comments related to his worry about "protectionism and isolationism" within the Republican party were referring to Paul's stance that the U.S. should withdraw from Afghanistan. He agrees with Paul that there are huge amounts of savings in the defense budget that could be realized by eliminating cost-plus contracts as well as tackling waste, fraud and abuse. But McCain believes that the savings should be reinvested in other parts of the defense department, such as operations and repairing war-damaged equipment, whereas Paul believes such savings should be taken away from the Pentagon.

 "I believe that with proper efficiencies, we could have savings of $100 billion over 5 years and I totally agree with Defense Secretary [Robert Gates] on that issue," McCain said, adding, "I am not in favor of cutting defense, I am in favor of savings, which could be huge, and reinvesting that in the neglected side of defense."