Monday, August 30, 2010 - 2:30 PM
There's a battle going on among the standard-bearers of the Tea Party over their foreign policy message. But at the rank-and-file level, Tea Partiers have no unified view on major foreign policy issues. They are all over the map.
Sarah Palin, who spoke at Glenn Beck's "Restoring Honor" rally on the Mall Saturday, would like the Tea Party to endorse her quasi-neoconservative approach to national security policy. She advocates aggressive unilateralism, ever-rising defense budgets, unfailing support of Israel, and a skeptical eye toward China, Russia, and any other possible competitor to the United States.
Ron Paul, a founding leader of the Tea Party who has seen the movement slip away from him somewhat, wants the movement's focus on thrift to extend to foreign policy, resulting in an almost isolationist approach that sets limits on the use of American power and its presence abroad.
In over a dozen interviews with self-identified Tea Party members at Saturday's rally, your humble Cable guy discovered that, when it comes to foreign policy, attendees rarely subscribed wholeheartedly to either Palin or Paul's world view. Despite claiming to share the same principles that informed their views, Tea Partiers often reached very different conclusions about pressing issues in U.S. foreign policy today.
Understandably, most Tea Party members at the rally viewed foreign policy through the prism of domestic problems such as the poor economy and the movement of jobs overseas. Almost all interviewees expressed support for U.S. troops abroad and a connection to Christianity they said informed their world view.
But that's where the similarities ended. Some attendees sounded like reliable neocons arguing for more troops abroad. Others sounded like antiwar liberals, lamenting the loss of life in any war for any reason. Still others sounded like inside the beltway realists, carefully considering the costs and benefits of a given policy option based on American national security interests.
For example, The Cable interviewed Danny Koss, a former Marine from Grove City, PA, who was measured when it came to talking about the war in Afghanistan.
"If we are going to stay, I suggest we really win," he said. "I'm not convinced that some of our leadership is ready for that. I know our generals are."
Koss, sounding like a realist, said that he saw China as a near-term economic threat but not a near-term military threat. A strike against Iran was not a good option, he argued, although he said it was wise of President Barack Obama to publicly state that all options are on the table.
When it came to the Israeli-Palestinian dispute, however, Koss seamlessly switched to a religious frame.
"You've got to go back and read the Bible, see who had it first. If you believe the Bible and who God gave it to, the rest is history," he said.
Later, we ran into Cecilia Goodow from Hartford, NY, who said that her foreign policy views were determined exclusively by her faith. This led her to regret the Bush administration's decision to invade Iraq.
"It sounded so reasonable at the time. But Holy Father John Paul II was against the war; he said it would just be an awful thing and many people would be killed," she said. "I always supported the troops, but we know history and we know that wars are sometimes perpetrated by evil people for evil reasons that the average person doesn't even know about or understand, so I can't wait for it all to stop."
Goodow said she wants Obama to stand up for America more and fight the forces of evil, which include Iran, but she doesn't support military intervention, even in Afghanistan.
"Sometimes that's cloudy -- why are we there? Barack Obama ran on the promise that he was going to bring everybody home. That's what we all sat around the table talking about. Maybe if there's a new presidential policy maybe we can have peace again, maybe we can bring our kids home," she said. "War begets more war."
On the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, we found Larry Maxwell of Patterson, NY. Dressed in full Revolutionary War regalia and holding a huge American flag, he was as much historian as activist, engaging passersby in debates about America's past.
While he supported the decision to go war in Iraq and largely believes claims that former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, Maxwell lamented the cost of the Iraq war and the danger of bolstering Iranian influence in the region.
But while Maxwell was concerned about the tensions surrounding Iran and its nuclear program, he didn't believe that a military strike is the best option.
"Are we the world's police? We're having a lot of trouble here and a lot of problems here. I'm not sure where our role comes over there," he said. "The United Nations would be the place for that ... but nobody listens to them."
Maxwell, like Koss, also referenced the Bible to support Israel's right to the land it now occupies. "The Bible says in the last days, that the Middle East, that's going to be the center of activity," he said. "If you go back to the Bible, it says there's going to be an army of 200 million men coming out of the East to the Middle East, as part of that whole Armageddon and ‘end of days' thing."
But not all Tea Partiers reflexively took Israel's side. Brandon Malator from Washington, DC, who dressed in U.S. Army fatigues and donned a cowboy hat with a Lipton tea bag dangling from the brim, was a stalwart supporter of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, but not of Israel.
"[We should] stay longer. We've never left any other country and we shouldn't leave Iraq," he said, adding that the U.S. is engaged in a 100-year-war that would include a coming war with Iran and eventually a war with China, which he called "World War III." He praised Obama for sending more troops to Afghanistan. "I think we're doing what we need to do as Americans. I think if the rest of the world doesn't like it, then that's tough luck."
But when it came to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Malatore's was downright dovish. "I hope that Israel and Palestine can come to an agreement, share the land, and do whatever they need to do to stop fighting all the time. I hope that war ends; that's been going on too long."
EXPLORE:ARAB WORLD, EAST ASIA, MIDDLE EAST, NORTH AMERICA, PACIFIC, AFGHANISTAN, IRAN, IRAQ, ISRAEL/PALESTINE, U.S. FOREIGN POLICY
So Many Things Are Wrong Here.
"You've got to go back and read the Bible, see who had it first. If you believe the Bible and who God gave it to, the rest is history," he said.
And then turn right around and say we were totally justified in taking out the innumerable Indians native to the North American continent.
"Barack Obama ran on the promise that he was going to bring everybody home."
Nope, he ran on the very specific promise that he would draw down in Iraq, and increase in Afghanistan.
And we lambast Turkey for not being secular...
...all the while, the US bases its relationship with the Middle East on idiotic notions concocted from the Bible.
Great Satan bases her 'lationship with Little Satan on shared values. Like a tolerant, egalitarian society with a penchant for periodic, transparent elections, a free, uncensored press, an independent judicary under elected gov oversight, a military under civilian control, off the charts literacy rates and a nat'l treasury under public scrutiny.
Hope this helps
For those secular Iranians,Arabs and Turks in this foreign policy look at this. The Americans you worshiped are inspired by anti-Islamic , hate preachers like Franklin Graham , Glenn Beck and John Hagee.
All of these people are deeply anti-Muslim and born-racists.
The real enemy of you is this religious American exceptionalism. What you secular Muslims should do is to join the fight against these American exceptionalists.
I like Palin, although her foreign policy could use some tweaks. We could do without budget busting defense budgets (although I don't mind them either), and we do need to work towards a new and different solution to the Palestinians and Israelis. I do support Israel though.
You don't mind "budget busting" defense spending? The Empire at home is crumbling; collapsing 40 year old infrastructure, a failing education system, a healthcare policy entitled only to the wealthy leaving the rest of us to choosing between everlasting bankruptcy and death, and a fascist-leaning condition of corporate welfare that owns every judge and politician on capitol hill. We're screwed and we've been screwed for the past decade. Sarah Palin won't do anything to cut military spending which is exactly what brought on this Great Recession hell-esque reality we've been stuck in for the past three years. It's time to bring everyone home, let the U.N. deal with the dictators, secure our borders from the virulent Mexican Civil War going on below us, and rebuild our once thriving country.
Budget-busting defense spending
Hey, if we don't buy thousands of Joint Strike Fighters, how are we supposed to battle The Beast With Seven Heads and Ten Horns???
The real Tea Party has no unified foreign policy ??
The title and content of this article are hardly surprising. The real Tea Party also has no unfied domestic policy, or economic policy, or health care policy, or any othe policy. The problem is that the Tea Partiers are a movement, not a party, and are able to affect elections but have no coherent philosphy for government. It's a bunch of people who are mad about many things, but have no solutions. The number of people who believe the Bible provides a guide to foreign policy are truly frightening. The Bible provides guidance for many things, but foreign policy is not one of them.
It was truly appalling to hear yesterday that this Glenn Beck rally was not a political event, but a religious event. The idea that Glenn Beck is spiritually enlightened and is going to lead the nation back to God would be farcical if it were not so nauseating. And that he shared the stage with Sarah Palin at this assertedly non-political revival is even more baffling. Ms. Palin has alreadly proven she is a lightweight as a political thinker; now she aspires to be a spiritual leader? What could possibly be more absurd and appalling.
I'm from Germany and two weeks ago I had a conversation with an Iranian friend of mine from the university. She was "educated" in Iran, meaning she got the whole range of mullah-Shiite doctrine that's being taught in Iranian schools. She lives in Germany now and one could say she's a regime critic.
I told her about the evangelical host parents I lived with when I spent a year in the States as an exchange student and about their "the Bible says we have to fight in Iraq" and "our troops do God's will in the Middle East" thing.
Her spontaneous reaction? "You guys (I guess she meant us "Westerners" collectively in that moment) have the same kind of silly religious preachers that we have in Iran, ranting on television and anywhere else about culture clash, the Great Satan and the religious necessity of war!"
I had had the thought before, but it was enlightening to hear it expressed by her so clearly.
I was quick to tell her that those people are (and I hope I didn't lie to her) a minority but with great influence.
So much for basing your foreign policy on some Holy Scripture! (Be it Qur'an or Bible)
(9)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE