Tuesday, August 24, 2010 - 5:18 PM
The State Department's top spokesman cautioned reporters Tuesday not to take snippets of edited remarks on the Internet by the "Ground Zero mosque" imam and use them to brand him a radical, lest they repeat the mistakes made by the media in calling former USDA official Shirley Sherrod a racist based on edited clips of her promoted on conservative websites.
Imam Feisal Rauf, the spiritual leader of the proposed Park 51 community center in lower Manhattan, is on his State Department-sponsored trip to the Persian Gulf right now, giving speeches in Bahrain, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates about what it's like to be a Muslim in America.
Rauf has been traveling on behalf of the department since 2007 on trips sponsored by both the Obama and George W. Bush administrations. He belongs to the progressive Sufi sect of Islam and has been praised as a bridge-builder even by conservative pro-Israel bloggers, such as the Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg, who has had extensive interactions with him.
But activists who oppose the Park 51 project have pointed to various statements by Rauf to build the case that he's dangerous radical. For example, yesterday Pamela Geller of the blog Atlas Shrugs posted a clip of excerpts from a speech Rauf gave in 2005. Those excerpts include Rauf saying:
We tend to forget, in the West, that the United States has more Muslim blood on its hands than al Qaida has on its hands of innocent non Muslims. You may remember that the US-led sanctions against Iraq led to the death of over half a million Iraqi children. This has been documented by the United Nations. And when Madeleine Albright, who has become a friend of mine over the last couple of years, when she was Secretary of State and was asked whether this was worth it, said it was worth it. [emphasis Geller's]
P.J. Crowley, the assistant secretary of state for public affairs, told reporters Tuesday that they shouldn't be quick to take those remarks out of context.
"I would just caution any of you that choose to write on this, that once again you have a case where a blogger has pulled out one passage from a very lengthy speech. If you read the entire speech, you will discover exactly why we think he is rightly participating in this national speaking tour."
The Cable asked Crowley directly, "Is he the Muslim Shirley Sherrod?"
Crowley responded, "That's a good cautionary tale for everybody."
The University of South Australia's Bob Hawke Prime Ministerial Centre has the full transcript and full audio recording of Rauf's 2005 remarks. Here are some excerpts not posted by the Atlas Shrugs blog:
On the bonds between Islam and Judeo Christianity:
We are united with Christians and Jews in terms of our belief in one God. In the tradition of the prophets. In our tradition of scriptures. The Jewish prophets, Jesus Christ and John the Baptist and Mary are in fact religious personalities and prophets of the Islamic faith as well...
From the point of view of Islamic theology, Islamic jurisprudence and Islamic history, the vast majority of Islamic history, it has been shaped or defined by a notion of multiculturalism and multireligiosity, if you might use that term. From the very beginning of Islamic history Islam created space for Christians of various persuasions, of Jews and even of Muslims of different schools of thought within the fabric of society.
On religious freedom:
A necessary part of this is to embrace and to welcome and to invite the religious voices in the public square, in the public debate, on how to build a good society. So multiculturalism, in my judgment, involves not only differences of culture and ethnicity but also multireligiosity, and that's where the challenge and the rub comes in for many because there is a perception that multireligiosity must mean the potential conflict between different religious voices in the public square. I, for one, believe that that is not in fact the case.
On religious tolerance:
[O]ur law, our sense of justice, our articulation of justice, must flow from these two commandments of loving our God and loving our neighbour, and if we are not sure of how to articulate the love of God in the public square we certainly can allow each person and each group of each religious group to choose to love God in the vernacular and in the liturgy that it chooses and it prefers, but it gives us a broad basis of agreement on which we can love our fellow human beings and this, I suggest, is the mandate that lies before us today as we embark on this 21st Century and is the mandate and the homework assignment that lies ahead of us.
On Islam and terrorism:
The broader community is in fact criticising and condemning actions of terrorism that are being done in the name of Islam... What complicates the discussion, intra-Islamically, is the fact that the West has not been cognisant and has not addressed the issues of its own contribution to much injustice in the Arab and Muslim world. It is a difficult subject to discuss with Western audiences but it is one that must be pointed out and must be raised.
Acts like the London bombing are completely against Islamic law. Suicide bombing, completely against Islamic law, completely, 100 per cent. But the facts of the matter is that people, I have discovered, are more motivated by emotion than by logic. If their emotions are in one place and their logic is behind, their emotions will drive their decisions more often than not, and therefore we need to address the emotional state of people and the extent to which those emotions are shaped by things that we can control and we can shape, this is how we will shape a better future.
Rauf is in Doha, Qatar, now, where in addition to giving a speech on Muslim life in America at a local university, he is meeting with government officials and NGO representatives and will hand out gifts and treats to children at the Doha Youth Center, Crowley said.
Although Rauf is getting questions about the controversy from his interlocutors and from the press in the areas he is visiting, don't expect him to talk about the Park 51 project, Crowley said.
"It's been suggested that through this tour he's going to be promoting this center, that's not true, or that he's going to be fundraising and that's not true," said Crowley. "He has chosen not to comment on the center so we can't be accused of doing things that are not consistent to the goals of the international program he's participating in and we respect those decisions."
Crowley also shot down another story in the conservative blogosphere today speculating that Rauf's wife Daisy Kahn will join the State Department-sponsored trip. Khan has elected to stay in the United States, he said.
EXPLORE:ARAB WORLD, MIDDLE EAST, AL QAEDA, DIPLOMACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, OBAMA ADMINISTRATION, STATE DEPARTMENT, TERRORISM
Imam Rauf the same as Slaver Shirley?
"Is he the Muslim Shirley Sherrod?" ---I don't know. Did he also keep young African-Americans in slave-like conditions so they could work on his farm? If so, then he definitely should not be on the State Department's payroll. What Slaver Shirley and her husband did to those poor kids was unconscionable.
Why do we waste our tax dollars on these fools?
The point is, why does the US taxpayer have to waste its money on religious "outreach" like this? And WE need to foot the bill to send this "religious" leader to oil-rich countries like Bahrain, Qatar, and the UAE?
As a committed agnostic, I'm appalled that the State Department has to enter the business of "religion" and waste our precious tax dollars on boondoggles for "religious" leaders like this fool...
Shows he knows how to appeal to the guilt and hubris of his audience.
Does Rauf renounce the Quran? Does he speak for many Muslims?
Some important Moslem Imams have written and preached that the Quran compels Islamic hatred of Jews (and other infidels). The Quran is the immutable word of god and according to the widely accepted Islamic doctrine of of itijihad, further interpretation of its contents is foreclosed. I invite Quranic scholars to comment on the following Quranic exegeses culled from Andrew G Bostom's publication "The Legacy of Islamic Anti-Semitism: from Sacred Texts to Solemn History." Bostrom maintains that the Quran is anti-Semitic in its roots.
The Qur’anic depiction of the Jews—their traits as thus characterized being deemed both infallible and timeless—highlights, in verse 2:61 (repeated in verse 3:112), the centrality of the Jews “abasement and humiliation”, and being “laden with God’s anger,” as elaborated in the corpus of Muslim exegetic literature on Qur’an 2:61, including the hadith and Qur’anic commentaries. The terrifying rage decreed upon the Jews forever is connected in the hadith and exegeses to Qur’an 1:7, where Muslims ask Allah to guide them rightly, not in the path of those who provoke and must bear His wrath. This verse is in turn linked to Qur’anic verses 5:60, and 5:78, which describe the Jews transformation into apes and swine (5:60), having been “…cursed by the tongue of David, and Jesus, Mary’s son” (5:78). Moreover, forcing Jews, in particular, to pay the Qur’anic poll tax “tribute,” (as per verse 9:29) “readily,” while “being brought low,” is consistent with their overall humiliation and abasement in accord with Qur’an 2:61, and its directly related verses.
An additional much larger array of anti-Jewish Qur’anic motifs build to a denouement (as if part of a theological indictment, conviction, and sentencing process) concluding with an elaboration of the “ultimate sin” committed by the Jews (they are among the devil’s minions [Qur’an 4:60], accursed by God [Qur’an 4:47]), and their appropriate punishment: If they do not accept the true faith (i.e., Islam), on the day of judgment, they will burn in the hellfire (Qur’an 4:55). As per, Qur’an 98:7: “The unbelievers among the People of the Book and the pagans shall burn forever in the fire of Hell. They are the vilest of all creatures”
............................................................................................................
The contemporary case of Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi, author of a 700 page scholarly treatise rationalizing Muslim Jew hatred, Banu Isra’il fi al-Qur’an wa al-Sunna [Jews in the Qur’an and the Traditions], and current Grand Imam of Al-Azhar University, demonstrates the prevalence and depth of sacralized, “normative” Jew hatred in the contemporary Muslim world.
Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi wrote these words in his 700 page treatise rationalizing Muslim Jew hatred, Banu Isra’il fi al-Qur’an wa al-Sunna [Jews in the Qur’an and the Traditions], originally published in the late 1960s, and early 1970s, and then re-issued in 1986/87:
"[The] Qur’an describes the Jews with their own particular degenerate characteristics, i.e. killing the prophets of Allah, corrupting His words by putting them in the wrong places, consuming the people’s wealth frivolously, refusal to distance themselves from the evil they do, and other ugly characteristics caused by their deep-rooted lasciviousness…only a minority of the Jews keep their word….[A]ll Jews are not the same. The good ones become Muslims, the bad ones do not. (Qur’an 3:113)"
Tantawi was apparently rewarded for this scholarly effort by being named Grand Imam of Al-Azhar University in 1996, a position he still holds. These are the expressed, “carefully researched” views on Jews held by the nearest Muslim equivalent to a Pope—the head of the most prestigious center of Muslim learning in Sunni Islam, Sunnis representing some 85% of the world’s Muslims. And Sheikh Tantawi has not mollified such hatemongering beliefs since becoming the Grand Imam of Al-Azhar as his statements on the Jews as “enemies of Allah, descendants of apes and pigs”, the legitimacy of homicide bombing of Jews, or “dialogue” with Jews as his following words make clear.
"…anyone who avoids meeting with the enemies in order to counter their dubious claims and stick fingers into their eyes, is a coward. My stance stems from Allah’s book [the Qur’an], more than one-third of which deals with the Jews…[I] wrote a dissertation dealing with them [the Jews], all their false claims and their punishment by Allah. I still believe in everything written in that dissertation. [i.e., from above, in Banu Isra’il fi al-Qur’an wa al-Sunna]"
Question: How does Rauf reconcile his public pronouncements on compatibility of Islam with Judiasm with the Quran's unambiguous condemnation and Grand Imam Tantawi's published position on Jews?
p.s. Let's not even get into Rauf's published support for the establishment of sharia which is itself blatantly homophobic, misogymistic, prescribes unequal treatment under the law for all women and non-Muslims and obliterates separation of church and state, prescribes death or mutilation for premarital sex and homosexuality, presribes death for apostasy (all schools of Islamic jurisprudence) and death for blasphemy.
p.p.s. I wonder whether Rauf would be willing to publicly renounce his position on Hamas as not being a terrorist organization.. After all, Hamas 's charter calls for the elimination of Israel and expressly rejects all compromise and peaceful solutons to the Palestinian-Israeli problems.
p.p.ps. Disclosure. I have not read either Bostrom or Tantawi. Much of the content here comes from Jihadwatch.org. I invite Quranic scholars to show me inaccuracies. I yearn to have my point of view corrected if it is incorrect.
—alibengolly
Read alibengolly's other letters
Permalink
If you read the speech that he gave in Australia on how to bridge the West and the Muslim world, you will see that Rauf is trying to make a case for moral equivalency . Al-Qaeda, Hamas, and other Islamic extremists have done bad things and Rauf falsely says that the United States, Israel and the West have also done bad things so we can all come together, make love, and sing Kumbaya. I don't think so.
In this article: "We tend to forget, in the West, that the United States has more Muslim blood on its hands than al Qaida has on its hands of innocent non Muslims. "
Al-Qaeda actually has more innocent Muslim blood on its hands than Rauf falsley claims the United States to have. Remember all the Al-Qaeda bombings that have taken place in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. Hundreds of thousands of innocent Muslims have been killed. Al-Qaeda has killed many more Muslims than non-Muslims. In fact it was all the Al-Qaeda bombings against Muslims in Iraq that led Al-Qaeda to lose support among many Iraqis, as well as other Muslims, and was one reason that the surge in Iraq was successful.
The part of the Qur'an that is left unmentioned states that it is permissible
to lie to non-believers so as not to reveal the true intent of Islam. It is per-
missible to fabricate any story or statement to promote the spread of Islam.
When the pronoun "we" is used, a small minority is usually speaking for a
much larger group.
When Christians or non-Christians say "we" worship the same God as
the Muslims, then they (the Christians and non-Christians) know very
little of what they're talking about!
The Muslims worship "Allah" who is one god; neither does he have a son;
and neither is he triune, (The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit)!
So how is it that the muslims worship "allah", and we Christians worship
God, Jehovah, and we are worshipping the same God?
I THINK NOT ! ! !
Their "allah" has different attributes than our God.
God, Jehovah, is Loving, Merciful, and Compassionate! He cannot do evil
(sin)! He has a Son, (Jesus Christ) and the Holy Spirit, and The Three make-
up the Triune Godhead. Period.
Yet Islam teaches that Allah sends both good and evil on people.
My God is not like that!
Josh Rogin reports on national security and foreign policy from the Pentagon to Foggy Bottom, the White House to Embassy Row, for The Cable.
Read More
(7)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE