Posted By Josh Rogin Share

The nomination of Frank Ricciardone to be the next U.S. ambassador to Turkey is being held up in the Senate and the GOP has no intention of allowing a vote on the nomination any time soon.

A spokesperson for Sen. Sam Brownback, R-KS, confirmed to The Cable that his office has placed a hold on the nomination, which was reported out favorably by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee last month. Brownback is preparing a letter now to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton explaining the reasons for his objections.

Brownback's office declined to specify the contents of the letter, but multiple GOP senate aides from other offices said that there was widespread support throughout the caucus for Brownback's position and that there was nothing specific the administration could do to convince Ricciardone's detractors to allow his nomination to proceed. If Brownback did release his hold, it's likely another one would surface soon after.

"He's just the wrong guy for this sensitive post at this time and the hope is that the administration will recognize that he won't be confirmed this year and nominate someone better," said one senior GOP aide close to the issue.

Of course, the president could appoint Ricciardone this month during the congressional recess and avoid a Senate confirmation vote, but then Ricciardone would be ambassador only until the new Congress is seated in January, at which point a potentially larger GOP Senate caucus would likely raise the same objections.

The controversy over the nomination is mired in the history of U.S. relations with several of the countries in which Ricciardone has served, including Turkey, Egypt, Iraq and Afghanistan.

To his supporters, Ricciardone is a distinguished 34-year veteran of the Foreign Service who has taken on tough assignments in dangerous places on behalf of both Democratic and Republican administrations. To his critics, Ricciardone's record shows a pattern of being too close to the governments he is interacting with and too tepid on the mission to push values such as democracy and human rights with tyrannical regimes.

The tenuous nature of the U.S.-Turkey relationship right now due to Turkey's vote against new sanctions for Iran at the U.N. and Turkey's bold anti-Israel stance in the wake of the Gaza flotilla incident have put a spotlight on the nomination.

The administration might be wary of spending its limited political capital to push through the Ricciardone nomination to a floor debate in the Senate because it could open up a broader public discussion of Turkey policy the White House might not think is useful given the delicate diplomatic environment.

There are signs that the administration is working hard now behind the scenes to reevaluate its approach to Turkey. For example, the State Department is hosting a high-level meeting today on Turkey policy, led by Clinton and Policy Planning chief Anne Marie Slaughter and with the participation of Assistant Secretary Phil Gordon.

"The ultimate aim of [the meeting] is to assess in a free, think-tanky sort of way, are we moving in the right direction, are there other areas we can address?" a State Department official said, explaining that this one of multiple meeting being held to come up with "out-of-the-box thinking to try to assess where we need to go."

One GOP Senate aide lamented that the administration seemed tone deaf to Republican objections to Ricciardone.

"They're trying to get together to figure out their Turkey policy and this nomination shows they don't have one."

 

AVNER STEIN

4:26 AM ET

August 13, 2010

Good

State Department lackies have a long history of getting to close to the regimes they work with.

Chaz Freeman feel in love with Saudi Arabia and was *gasp* steamrolled out of Congress during his intelligence nomination.

We need an impartial, uninvolved diplomat with no history of interacting with rivaling regimes. 20 years in the Islamic cesspool is quite disturbing. We don't need a cheerleader, we need an American leader who is 100% pro-American.

Don't need some asshat like Kilgor and Freeman to come into the job with stockholm syndome.

 

DICKERSON3870

7:54 AM ET

August 14, 2010

RE: "20 years in the Islamic cesspool..." - AVNER STEIN, RACIST

FROM "WAYNE MADSEN REPORTS", 08/12/10: ...WMR has learned from U.S. diplomatic sources that AIPAC, in effect, "owns" four U.S. ambassadorial posts in the Mediterranean region: Rome, Rabat, Ankara, and Tel Aviv.

 

JUSTICE10

3:51 PM ET

August 13, 2010

Freeman

Chaz Freeman is a real patriot. He has realized that people like you and your lobby have hijacked our country and are about to bankrupt us. He is an American leader who is 200% pro-American, unlike your treasonous lobby.

 

DEPETRIS@WORDPRESS.COM

4:55 PM ET

August 13, 2010

Lame excuse for a hold

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't building close relationships with foreign governments to whole purpose of being a U.S. Ambassador? Gaining the trust of foreign leaderships, extending a hand in times of crisis, and getting at the root of the problems in the broader partnership are primary tasks for all Ambassadors...regardless of where they are assigned. This is exactly what Ryan Crocker achieved in Iraq at a rocky time in that nation's history, and the security situation (while tenuous) is all the better for it. This is what George Mitchell- as a U.S. Envoy- is trying to do with the Israelis and Palestinians, and the same goes with Special Envoy Richard Holbrooke with the Afghans and Pakistanis.

The excuse that Republicans are using to block Mr. Ricciardone's nomination is a bit baseless. Saying that he's going to be too close to the foreign governments he is working with is like saying a teacher is going to be too engaged with his/her students.

The real reason for the objection- in my view- is the Republican Party's objection to President Obama's policy of talking with states that are traditionally seen as U.S. enemies or weak U.S. allies. This is why Robert Ford is still waiting for a full vote on his nomination to Syria.

http://www.atlanticsentinel.com

 

JUSTICE10

6:43 PM ET

August 13, 2010

Republicans

Republicans are just a tool in this case (the "useful idiots") for a foreign lobby's attempt to control our foreign policy to the detriment of our country, the U.S.A.

 

AVNER STEIN

11:01 PM ET

August 13, 2010

What lobby?

Freeman was opposed on all sides.

Freeman was steamrolled from his nomination at the NIC because he had been hired for Chinese and Saudi Arabian interests in the US. He was McGovern's successor on the ME policy council, which is a Saudi front group.

He calls himself a patriot and speaks of US interests, but he's really in it for Saudi paymasters.

He is a FRINGE character in the American foreign policy community. He was not victim of some sinister lobby, he was a traitor and Saudi puppet.

 

John Hudson reports on national security and foreign policy from the Pentagon to Foggy Bottom, the White House to Embassy Row, for The Cable.

Enter your email address to get The Cable delivered to your inbox each night:

Delivered by FeedBurner