Posted By Josh Rogin Share

When State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley refused to tell reporters which countries have offered assistance to help respond to the BP oil spill, the State Department press corps was flabbergasted.

"As a policy matter, we're not going to identify those offers of assistance until we are able to see, you know, what we need, assess the ongoing situation. And as we accept those offers of assistance, we will inform you," Crowley said.

Reporters pointed out that the Bush administration identified assistance offers after the Katrina disaster, so what is this, a new policy? They pressed Crowley, but he refused to budge.

Then they mentioned Iran's offer of assistance, through its National Iranian Drilling Company. Crowley said there was no Iranian offer of assistance, at least in any official capacity. The reporters kept on it, asking why it was taking so long to figure out what was needed in the first place? That's the Coast Guard's decision, Crowley explained.

Late Wednesday evening, the State Department emailed reporters identifying the 13 entities that had offered the U.S. oil spill assistance. They were the governments of Canada, Croatia, France, Germany, Ireland, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Romania, Republic of Korea, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United Nations. 

"These offers include experts in various aspects of oil spill impacts, research and technical expertise, booms, chemical oil dispersants, oil pumps, skimmers, and wildlife treatment," the email read.

"While there is no need right now that the U.S. cannot meet, the U.S. Coast Guard is assessing these offers of assistance to see if there will be something which we will need in the near future."

The Obama administration has been relentless in its messaging that it is doing everything possible to aggressively respond to the oil spill. But for the record, the current message to foreign governments is: Thanks but no thanks, we've got it covered.

A State Department official, speaking on background, said that the decision not to initially release the names of offering countries came directly from the State Department leadership.

 

RHBCAZNY

6:42 PM ET

May 6, 2010

Imtemize nukes but not our

Imtemize nukes but not our friends. Are there any adults in this regime?

 

RHBCAZNY

6:43 PM ET

May 6, 2010

Itemize

Itemize

 

HOLLAR01

6:58 PM ET

May 6, 2010

Definition of 'Background'

It would seem that you missed the definition of background in Journalism 101. If your State Department source is speaking on background, you're not allowed to report exactly what he told you, unless you independently verify it with others -- and then you would attribute it to them.

What you've done here is used an anonymous source -- which is fine, so long as you identify it as such.

 

LONDON SEO

8:41 AM ET

May 7, 2010

London SEO

I\'m happy I found this blog, I could not discover any information on this subject matter prior to. I also run a site and if you want to ever serious in a little bit of guest writing for me if possible feel free to let me know, i\'m always look for people to check out my site. Many many thanks for sharing this post with us. Please write more so that we can get more updates in your blog.
London SEO

 

KITCHEN SCALE

3:48 PM ET

May 10, 2010

administration

Obama is a nice person , I think he sure have some other plans.

 

John Hudson reports on national security and foreign policy from the Pentagon to Foggy Bottom, the White House to Embassy Row, for The Cable.

Enter your email address to get The Cable delivered to your inbox each night:

Delivered by FeedBurner