The Cable

Obama's engagement policy: good for the U.N., bad for Obama?

Americans are responding to President Obama's embrace of the United Nations with increased support of the organization, even as their support of Obama himself declines, according to a new survey released Wednesday.

New polling data shows that nationwide, Americans view the United Nations with increased praise and support. The national survey of 900 likely voters was conducted by Public Opinion Strategies and Hart Research Associates from April 10-14 on behalf of the United Nations Foundation, a public charity that works closely with U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. The firms also conducted four focus groups in Virginia and Washingon, D.C. to round out their findings.

But while the survey had some good news for the U.N., the news on respondents' views of the direction of America and the Obama administration wasn't so rosy.

According to the data, 60 percent of those surveyed had a positive view of the United Nations, that's up ten points from data only 10 months ago. Two-thirds said it is "an organization that's still needed today." Thirty percent said they viewed the U.N. unfavorably and 26 percent said it had "outlived its usefulness."

"This new data confirms that Americans recognize that working together with our international partners through the U.N. is more effective than trying to solve the world's challenges alone," said Timothy E. Wirth, president of the United Nations Foundation.

Natural disasters are the top news stories of the past few months, the survey found, and "The U.N.'s image has been impacted by a very positive news environment around the organization providing humanitarian relief during the natural disasters that have happened recently around the world," the organization's press memo argues.

But the same respondents criticized the Obama administration while praising the U.N.

As of April, only 36 percent of those surveyed said they believed the U.S.  is going in the "right direction," down from 41 percent last June. Fifty-eight percent said the country is on the "wrong track," up from 51 percent only 10 months prior. (That's still up from the 21 percent of people who said America was headed in the right direction when Obama took office.)

President Obama's direct approval rating fell to 49 percent in April, down from 57 percent last June. His disapproval rating rose from 38 to 47 percent during the same time period.

The survey also revealed some serious gaps in the knowledge base of Americans following foreign policy. For example,  although 78 percent of respondents claimed to "closely" follow international affairs, an equal 78 percent said they had "never heard" of Ban Ki-moon when asked about him.

When those surveyed were told that Ban was the secretary-general of the United Nations, 41 percent of respondents still had no idea who he was.

One of the main goals of the survey was to gather opinions on U.S. foreign assistance and the U.N.-led Millennium Development Goals. Eighty-seven percent said they supported U.S. involvement in achieving the goals by 2015.

But in a blow to Bono and a boost to North Dakota Sen.  Kent Conrad, only 40 percent of respondents said they would support spending an additional 1 percent of the U.S. budget on foreign assistance, with 55 percent opposed.

The margin of error for the sample was +/- 3.27 percent.

JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images

The Cable

Japanese lawmaker: Obama pushing us toward China

When Barack Obama met briefly with Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama on the sidelines of last month's nuclear summit, he asked the Japanese leader to follow through on his promise to resolve the U.S.-Japan dispute over relocating the Marine Corps base on Okinawa.

But as Hatoyama's self-imposed May deadline approaches, it doesn't look like the prime minister is going to be able to deliver, and some Japanese lawmakers are now going public with their criticism of the way the Obama administration has handled the issue.

One of them is Kuniko Tanioka, a member of Japan's upper house of parliament and the ruling Democratic Party of Japan, and a close advisor to Hatoyama. During a visit to Washington Tuesday, Tanioka leveled some of the harshest criticism from a Japanese official to date of the Obama team's handling of the Futenma issue, which is still unresolved despite months of discussions.

"We are worried because the government of the United States doesn't seem to be treating Prime Minister Hatoyama as an ally," she told an audience at the East-West Center. "The very stubborn attitude of no compromise of the U.S. government on Futenma is clearly pushing Japan away toward China and that is something I'm very worried about."

Some Japan hands in Washington see Tanioka as marginal, a left-wing backbencher who just recently entered Japanese politics in 2007. But she is close to Hatoyama and serves as the "vice manager" for North America inside the DPJ's internal policy structure.

At issue is a 2006 agreement between the Bush administration and the former Japanese government run by the Liberal Democratic Party. That agreement would have moved the Futenma Air Station, which sits in the middle of a populated area of Okinawa, to a less obtrusive part of the island.

Hatoyama and the DPJ campaigned on the promise to alter the plan but ran into a wall when U.S. officials initially insisted the old agreement be honored, even though the old government had been thrown out.

Since then, Pentagon and State Department officials have been conducting quiet negotiations, but the administration is still waiting for the Japanese side to propose a detailed alternative to the current plan.

Meanwhile, huge protests in Okinawa have constrained Hatoyama's room for maneuver -- and Tanioka said the United States was partly to blame.

"It seems to us Japanese that Obama is saying ‘You do it, you solve, it's your problem,'" she said, noting that public opinion polls in Japan show increasing dissatisfaction with the presence of U.S. military forces there.

Obama should have granted Hatoyama a bilateral meeting during the recent nuclear summit if he is really concerned about Futenma, she said, not just a passing conversation at dinner.

"If it is such a serious problem, then he should have sat down. If it's not so serious of a problem, he should say so."

Administration officials have also said repeatedly that they are willing to consider adjustments to the current Futenma relocation plan, but it has to be "operationally feasible," meaning it meets Marine Corps needs, and "politically feasible," meaning that the Japanese host communities can go along.

Therein lies the problem, according to Tanioka, because, she says, "There is no politically feasible plan."

"Washington works under the assumption the original plan was feasible. It was not," she said.

While Tanioka acknowledges that Hatoyama and the DPJ have made some mistakes, especially in dealing with the media, she suggested that now the security relationship itself could be in danger.

"It's getting much worse than I expected," she said. "They are going to start saying ‘all bases out,' not only the Marines."