If there is one issue that every one of the last seven secretaries of state agrees on, it's the need to increase State Department and foreign assistance funding next year.

That's the message Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell, Madeleine Albright, Warren Christopher, Lawrence Eagleburger, James Baker, George Shultz, and Henry Kissinger sent to Congress in a letter (pdf) Tuesday urging Congress to support President Obama's request for $58.5 billion worth of funding for State Department and foreign operations in fiscal 2011.

Their argument is the same as that made by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Defense Secretary Robert Gates, and the entire development community: that the administration's requested increases for foreign operations is needed to protect America's influence in the world and achieve U.S. national-security objectives.

"Increasing the investment in our civilian international capabilities will keep America safer by, among other things, addressing the root causes of terrorism and extremism, supporting key allies, and demonstrating America's proud tradition of global leadership," the former dignitaries wrote. "This is one area where Democrats and Republicans can agree and should come together to help ensure a more secure and prosperous future for our nation."

The timing of the letter is no coincidence. John Kerry's Senate Foreign Relations Committee is marking up its first authorization bill since 2005 Tuesday, part of its effort to defend the president's request, which is actually only a modest boost over last year for most accounts because the bulk of the increases will go to supporting an increased civilian role in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan.

Defenders of the president's budget are fighting an uphill battle against a Congress looking to push funds to domestic priorities and under pressure to slash spending ahead of the coming midterm elections. Their effort was hurt last week when Sen. Kent Conrad's Budget Committee approved a resolution slashing $4 billion from Obama's request, the first of what is sure to be many twists and turns as the budget process moves forward.

House Foreign Affairs Chairman Howard Berman issued a strong statement defending the president's budget Monday.

"This budget outline would slash critical funding to our Foreign Service Officers and development professionals precisely at the time when the President is seeking to stand up our civilian capacity in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq," he said. "The notion that this budget would have no impact on our national security funding is simply misleading."

 
Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

GRANT

5:41 PM ET

April 27, 2010

58.5. Wow. That's what the

58.5. Wow. That's what the State gets. Even if we accept that the State dept. and Dept. of Defense have different needs and costs that's still not even close to what the military is getting.

 

Josh Rogin reports on national security and foreign policy from the Pentagon to Foggy Bottom, the White House to Embassy Row, for The Cable.

Read More

Enter your email address to get The Cable delivered to your inbox each night:

Delivered by FeedBurner