Monday, March 8, 2010 - 2:19 PM

Despite his decisions to surge troops to Afghanistan, delay the closure of the U.S. prison at Guantánamo Bay, and perhaps reverse himself by endorsing military commissions for terror suspects, President Obama is still losing ground in polls related to national security.
Such is the finding of a new major survey released Monday by leading Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg, top party operative James Carville, and the folks at the progressive national security think tank Third Way, which they are framing as "a wake-up call for President Obama, his party, and progressives on national security."
"Although the public continues to give the president strong ratings on a range of national security issues -- indeed, above his overall approval rating -- there is evidence of rising public concern about the president's handing of these issues," the group said Monday, arguing that Republicans are winning ground by portraying the administration's handling of terror suspects as lenient or risky.
Obama's ratings on key national security issues were still high, according to the poll; his handling of Afghanistan (58 percent), national security (57 percent), "leading America's military" (57 percent), "improving America's standing in the world" (55 percent), fighting terrorism (54 percent), and Iraq (54 percent), were all higher than his 47 percent overall approval rating.
But those numbers were down from levels in the 60s that were recorded by the same group last May. Fewer respondents now say they view Obama's handling of national-security issues as better than that of his predecessor George W. Bush -- Obama's margin here has shrunk from 22 to just 5 percent.
The pollsters warn that Obama's declining numbers could re-open the Democratic Party's traditional vulnerability on national security, a problem dating back to the Vietnam era.
"When the questions move beyond the president to Democrats generally, we see that the public once again has real and rising doubts about the Democrats' handling of national security issues, as compared to their faith in Republicans," the survey explained.
Regardless, the report argues that "the public resists accusations by former Vice President Dick Cheney and other Republicans that President Obama and his policies have made the country less secure." Although the report offers little to support that assertion, recent developments indicate that some leading Republicans are uncomfortable with the harshest criticisms launched by some on the right.
Several former Justice Department officials have criticized the group Keep America Safe, which is led by Liz Cheney and William Kristol, for its attacks on the department for hiring lawyers who have defended terror suspects in the past, including one particularly controversial ad calling some of them the "al Qaeda 7."
"The American tradition of zealous representation of unpopular clients is at least as old as John Adams's representation of the British soldiers charged in the Boston massacre," reads a letter organized by the Brookings Institution's Benjamin Wittes and signed by David Rivkin, Lee Casey, and Philip Zelikow, among other prominent Republican lawyers.
"To suggest that the Justice Department should not employ talented lawyers who have advocated on behalf of detainees maligns the patriotism of people who have taken honorable positions on contested questions and demands a uniformity of background and view in government service from which no administration would benefit."
AFP/Getty Images
Now I can be proud again to be an American
...regardless, the report argues that "the public resists accusations by former Vice President Dick Cheney and other Republicans that President Obama and his policies have made the country less secure." ...This is not the case. Our country is more secure than ever because of Obama. The fact alone that an african/american made it into office (the first time ever in American history!!!!) in our country is stabilizing national security .
Before Mr. Obama got into the office, America had a very bad reputation almost everywhere in the world. Only exceptions were may some "countries" like Cuba etc.
Now I can be proud again to be an American and I can say so without repercussions.
Please explain how simply having a black president makes us safer. Your claim smacks of a bit of prejudice since you tie something solely to the color of one's skin, rather than to the "content of his character." Our security remains stable because the President is essentially using the same playbook as his predecessor. Don't believe me? Ask those on the far left; they're completely livid about it.
As a lawyer, I'm glad to see FP bring up the unwarranted smear campaign being pursued by Keep American Safe. Lawyers representing a client do not automatically assume that client's ideology. Lawyers represent the ideal of due process and equality before the law. If you're problem is that these clients should not be tried in a criminal court, fine. But to then attempt to undermine the very system you purport to support by threatening lawyers for simply doing their job is hypocritical and disgusting. In doing so, lawyer judgment and opinion is chilled thereby generating anegative effect on the justice system. Again, if you're problem is the forum for handling these clients, you're issue is with politicians not laywers.
I see this attempt fromt he right as the same as the attempt from the left to criminally try Bush era attorneys for their legal opinions. While you may disagree with those opinions, it is not against the law to offer an opinion, no matter how far it may or may not be off the mark. Again, your problem is with politicians. Lawyers provide advice; political leaders (in this case) determine whether to follow it or not and accept the consequences.
Lawyers must be free to represent even the most horrifying of clients. It is what our systen is founded on and goes to the very core of who we are as a nation. Those on the right often quote Benjamin Franklin ("those who would give up essential liberty to obtain a little temprary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety") should apply that same sentiment to themselves for the right to counsel is certainly a part of liberty.
Josh Rogin reports on national security and foreign policy from the Pentagon to Foggy Bottom, the White House to Embassy Row, for The Cable.
Read More
(3)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE