Thursday, November 26, 2009 - 12:31 AM
As far as we know, the U.S. government isn't focused on engaging the Taliban or other militants waging war on the Afghan government and international forces, but there is one country actively working on a plan to reconcile the warring factions in Afghanistan: Japan.
A conference held behind closed doors in Tokyo finished the last of its three days of meetings Wednesday, bringing together representatives of the governments of Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and others to discuss how a peace within Afghanistan might be negotiated. Among the participants was Mohammad Masoom Stanekzai, an advisor on reconciliation to Afghan President Hamid Karzai.
Stanekzai has often advocated for internal Afghan reconciliation and in his capacity as a visiting fellow at the U.S. Institute of Peace last year, he wrote that "A multitude of factors suggest that the time is ripe for a reconciliatory process," and "A comprehensive and coordinated political reconciliation process must be started."
The conference ended with a list of recommendations, obtained by The Cable, that will now be sent to Japanese Foreign Minister Katsuya Okada as he charts out Japan's future policy on Afghanistan.
The Japanese government, now led by the Democratic Party of Japan, has been searching for a new role in Afghanistan after announcing it would end its military refueling mission there but also increase its aid contribution by $5 billion.
Leading an international effort to negotiate a détente between the Afghan Taliban and the Afghan government could be how the DPJ forges a new identity for Japan's foreign policy, which has long been tethered to U.S. foreign policy. The DPJ has called for a more independent position in the Japanese alliance with Washington.
"Since Japan enjoys an excellent reputation with Afghanistan and the immediate neighbors of Afghanistan, it is highly desirable that Japan play a key role within the international community in supporting the peace and reintegration program led by the Afghan government," the recommendations state.
Earlier this year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton set out the conditions under which she believes reconciliation with certain members of the Taliban could be achieved.
"We understand that not all those who fight with the Taliban support al-Qaida, or believe in the extremist policies the Taliban pursued when in power," she said at the Council of Foreign Relations on July 15, "And today we and our Afghan allies stand ready to welcome anyone supporting the Taliban who renounces al-Qaida, lays down their arms, and is willing to participate in the free and open society that is enshrined in the Afghan Constitution."
But Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrooke said Nov. 23 that "there has been no direct meetings between American officials and Taliban officials ... we are not having direct contacts with the Taliban."
The conference was organized by World Conference of Religions for Peace Japan committee and was arranged with help of the group Japanese Parliamentarians for Shared Security and with cooperation of the Japanese foreign ministry.
Factual and non-speculative. I wish there is more that can be disclosed, but that will only happen when the time is ripe.
I only hope as some participant said, that "in the next 6-12 months things will change radically," partly due to the planned (and expected) military surge and mostly, hopefully, due to the specifically focused effort of that commitment to reintegration and reconciliation efforts, as requested specifically by the GoIRA.
Quick and to the point - I fear the presence of more than one nation trying to strike up deals between the Afghan government and the Taliban. The more hands in the mix the larger the chances of both sides playing against all the hands. Neither side will make as many deals that the US would like, and at the same time won't make as many deals as the Japanese would like. Both nations will provide additional funds to the sides, and nothing constructive will happen. One complaint from the first four years of the Iraqi campaign was that the locals didn't have the same people to deal with month after month. I doubt Afghanistan will be any different and the existence of more nations trying to strike up large deals will not be good...
"And today we and our Afghan allies stand ready to welcome anyone supporting the Taliban who renounces al-Qaida, lays down their arms, and is willing to participate in the free and open society that is enshrined in the Afghan Constitution."
H'mm, why would the Taliban do that?
President Hamid Karzai is a Pashtun and knows many of the Taliban leaders. Yet he could not get them to even to talk to him. Now Japanese with no contacts with Taliban, except through Pakistan (whose motives are against the coalition's objectives) want to try cash diplomacy - what a pipe dream! Taliban earn enough money through drug smuggling and contribution from Arab charities. Pakistan provides Taliban with enough weapons, logistics and medical support. So why would Taliban need Japan to make peace with Western powers?
i don't think so,when America not bring peace to Afghanistan how can say that China do ti.its no debut that China is very strong country they have all think which need in Afghanistan.but its true that Afghanistan is a dead end.
http://ezinearticles.com/?Best-Anti-Wrinkle-Cream-Review---Revealed-by-Dr-Oz-on-Oprahs-Show&id=2271470
(5)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE