Posted By Josh Rogin Share

Greg Bruno at the Council on Foreign Relations snags an interview with Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki during his visit to Washington and Mottaki lays out the Iranian thinking on a host of issues. Below are some excerpts.

Mottaki on the talks in Geneva:

By presenting a package of proposals, we wanted to show that Iran is serious for these negotiations. We have given three topics in the proposed package and that makes it possible for all parties to enter into discussions even about the nuclear program. That also includes political and security issues, economic matters, and international cooperation. And in the international part, some matters can be dedicated to the nuclear programs and nuclear issues. We are optimistic about the talks tomorrow. Because the negotiations are taking place after a long time, we should not have much expectation. Maybe that requires formation of some committees to continue the process.

On the Iran's rights under the Non-Proliferation Treaty:

We are not going to compromise our legal rights under any circumstances toward the enjoyment of legal activities. And we have no plan at the moment to withdraw from the NPT.

On allowing access to the newly revealed facility near Qom:

The date will be discussed and coordinated within the Atomic Energy Agency of Iran and the IAEA later on. They would exchange letters. So from our side, there is no problem. Any date that is agreed between the two sides would be respected and the visit or access will be exercised.

On what happened during the G-20:

We think in Pittsburgh, President Obama was misled based on wrong information and wrong analysis. The wrong analysis was provided by the British. Wrong information by certain terrorist groups ... It seems to me that President Obama should be very mindful of these issues and statements.

EXPLORE:IRAN, NUKES
 
Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

JPWREL

5:09 PM ET

October 1, 2009

What's Iran's problem?

What is it with Iran and the British? It seems that at every moment from reacting to criticism of their recent banana republic election to the intelligence assessment on the Qom site the Iranians particularly target the British for abuse? In this era the British would love to enjoy the sway the Iranians ascribe to them in international affairs. Perhaps they are still smarting from that smartly executed SAS action against their London embassy way back in 1980. ?

 

EMBRA

11:41 AM ET

October 2, 2009

Iran and the British

It's all about their history, particularly the first half of C20th. They were shafted whenever Iranian interests conflicted with the British strategic interests (e.g. the need for oil to fight the Nazis). Because the British never used lots of soldiers, they have a reputation for pulling the strings behind the scenes. Ironic really - Iran got off easily compared to many countries in the Empire/sphere of influence.

Gawd bless 'em, though - along with Mugabe, they're the last people on earth to think that we still count for something.

(Also they know they have to deal with the Yanks, so reserve the worst of their bile for the Brits)

 

Josh Rogin reports on national security and foreign policy from the Pentagon to Foggy Bottom, the White House to Embassy Row, for The Cable.

Read More

Enter your email address to get The Cable delivered to your inbox each night:

Delivered by FeedBurner