Friday, September 25, 2009 - 11:35 PM

Gitmo watchers who've paid close attention to the Obama administration's troubled effort to close the Cuba prison were surprised by a startling article in the Washington Post today in which White House Counsel Greg Craig says he basically mishandled the effort to close Guantánamo and which quotes sources as claiming he may leave the White House if an overseas appointment for him can be found.
Several advocates of closing the prison -- as Obama pledged to do within one year as one of his first acts as president -- said Craig is being made the fall guy for a lack of attention across the senior levels of the government, combined with the unwillingness of congressional Democrats to stand behind the plan to close the prison.
"I think it's bizarre to blame Greg Craig for Guantánamo and whatever challenges they faced in closing it," said Ken Gude, Guantánamo expert at the Center for American Progress.
The administration got off to a slow start and then got caught flat-footed when GOP senators and former Vice President Dick Cheney teamed up to spread the idea that closing the prison would lead to terrorists being released in American communities. And the administration never coordinated with congressional allies to lay the needed groundwork.
"To blame Craig because there was no legislative strategy in the White House strikes a lot of us as unfair and odd," said Sarah Mendelson, director of the Human Rights and Security Initiative at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
The other main claim in the article, namely that the Obama administration couldn't meet its own timeline because the Bush administration left the files on the 226 prisoners in Guantánamo in disarray, is true, but also not the real reason behind the strategy failure, she said.
The administration's real failure was in the spring - around April and May -- when the Republicans decided to make the Guantánamo issue their focus and congressional Democrats, feeling abandoned by the White House, yielded the debate.
Virginia Democratic Rep. James Moran, who led a one-man charge to counter GOP's Guantánamo campaign, said there were many Obama officials to blame in an interview with The Cable.
"Greg Craig was not the person responsible for the delay on the Guantanamo plan," said Moran. "He is a professional; he was given a lot to do, little backup, and apparently virtually no information on the background of the detainees and the kind of talking points that were needed."
Congress was stonewalled, not just by Craig, but by the Defense Department and Justice Department as well.
"Those of us on the Hill who wanted to defend the administration's policy because we knew we had the facts on our side got no back up, no support, no information," Moran said, speculating that the Obama team simply didn't want to spend political capital on the issue.
That became clear to Moran and others in Congress in May, when the war funding bill was moving through Congress and Republicans took to the airwaves to decry the plan to shudder the prison. "We were at the Alamo, and the cavalry was galloping in the other direction," said Moran, "I think it was a political decision. I don't know who made it, but I very much doubt it was Greg Craig."
Other key appropriators who were trying to fund the effort, such as defense subcommittee chairman Jack Murtha, D-PA, and Appropriations chairman David Obey, D-WI, couldn't and wouldn't fight the Republican machine without Obama's help.
"They talked to the White House and the White House wasn't willing to stand alongside them," said Moran. The thinking among Democrats was, "If we can't take advantage of Obama's credibility on this issue, we probably are not going win."
Now the administration is trying to press the reset button on Guantánamo, but Moran argued the damage is done and it is now nearly impossible to sell the idea of moving the prisoners to U.S. soil.
"This is their first major fuck up, and it's an enormous fuckup, because now that you've lost ground you're not going to be able to recover it," said Moran.
Alex Wong/Getty Images
Hmm, I smell a stinky. A stinky smoke bomb.
Seems to me like the Obama administration DID make closing Guantanomo an early priority.
If memory serves me right, Lord of Darkness Cheney and other right wing nut jobs started spreading their stinky smoke bombs about terrorists on American soil and all that malarky.
The problem as I see it has less to do with an Obama administration faux pas, as it has to do with Democrats' divisions within the party itself.
If Democrats would just get back to the business of what they have historically done best - representing the average American citizen - and grow a pair when it comes to standing up to the right wing Republican propaganda machine, they might get something done.
Until then, Democrats will remain as dancing puppets trying to please their Republican masters.
Another problem was that they decided to do it in just one year. I'll admit that Cheney acted in a manner very unbecoming of a former official when he so drastically damaged policy for domestic politics and I feel showed he a great lack of real loyalty to the country, but Obama had to have known that you couldn't realistically close the prison in such a short time.
If, moving the terrorists and enemy combatants to U. S. soil is such a good idea; then maybe ky. woman will enjoy their company living next-door to her. If she thinks that idea isn't good; then she needs to explain why it is not a good one. So, let's say she gets her way about the closure and they all come onto our U.S. soil. Let's also say, for some reason, they got out of prison; then what? Do they get to live here with all of the rights and freedoms as native born Americans? Free to go about their business of whatever they do? Let's now say that with all of their new found freedoms, that they plot with each other to make some ricin gas and use it on all of the patrons of the Ky. Derby. I would imagine that about 50,000 or so people would die. Is that not an awful amount of people to die? For what reason would they die? Would it be because of some arbitrary time line promised by someone who didn't have all of the facts about a situation? Since I and she might be a victim of the terrorists insane ideas of who is an infidel and their deadly methods of enforcing their ideas; I am (and I'm sure the other 49,999 possible victims think the same way) not willing to take that chance.
Maybe you should study up on terrorist attacks. Aum Shinrikyo tried an unconventional attack and failed miserably. A terrorist who actually wanted to do something wouldn't bother with ricin, they'd use explosives*.
Second: even the previous administration had to admit that most of them weren't very dangerous, and even among the ones who were insurgents you'd be hard pressed to find one who wanted (or was able) to carry out a terrorist attack. I suggest you read Kilcullen sometime, the majority of Afghani insurgents are essentially peasants more interested in harvest and money than in religion or who's in charge of the government.
*Ricin isn't a very useful material for terrorist attacks, it can't spread from person to person via touch, there is no way that at an open air event like the Kentucky Derby even an airborne version could touch 1,000 victims, and the Center for Disease Control notes that you would need to "inhale significant amounts" to die. Frankly I'm not sure why you chose ricin as an example, it's an assassin's tool not a terrorists.
In light of the recent arrest of Najibullah Zazi...
...are we really sure that we need to be closing these facilities so hastily? Generally will anyone feel safer as a result? It's one thing to admit wrongdoing and try to correct it, it's another to close it completely. They're still out there, they're still plotting, and they're going to do more damage on a broad scale...it's just a matter of when.
.
I don't trust people with two first names.
Josh Rogin reports on national security and foreign policy from the Pentagon to Foggy Bottom, the White House to Embassy Row, for The Cable.
Read More
(7)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE