Thursday, September 24, 2009 - 12:23 AM
Sarah Palin made huge news when she spoke yesterday to a group of Hong Kong business types with former McCain campaign foreign-policy guru Randy Scheunemann in tow. The speech included some of the most critical statements about the Chinese Communist Party by an American political leader in years.
Now The Cable brings you previously unreleased extended excerpts of Palin's speech, which give a window into the foreign-policy persona she is crafting in anticipation of 2012.
Palin on the post Cold War international order:
Later this year, we will celebrate the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall - an event that changed not just Europe but the entire world. In a matter of months, millions of people in formerly captive nations were freed to pursue their individual and national ambitions.
The competition that defined the post World War II era was suddenly over. What was once called "the free world" had so much to celebrate - the peaceful end to a great power rivalry and the liberation of so many from tyranny's grip.
Some, you could say, took the celebration too far. Many spoke of a "peace dividend," of the need to focus on domestic issues and spend less time, attention and money on endeavors overseas. Many saw a peaceful future, where globalization would break down borders and lead to greater global prosperity. Some argued that state sovereignty would fade - like that was a good thing? -- , that new non-governmental actors and old international institutions would become dominant in the new world order.
As we all know, that did not happen.
On the so-called Global War on Terror:
This war - and that is what it is, a war - is not, as some have said, a clash of civilizations. We are not at war with Islam. This is a war WITHIN Islam, where a small minority of violent killers seeks to impose their view on the vast majority of Muslims who want the same things all of us want: economic opportunity, education, and the chance to build a better life for themselves and their families. The reality is that al Qaeda and its affiliates have killed scores of innocent Muslim men, women and children.
On the U.S.-led mission in Afghanistan:
We can win in Afghanistan by helping the Afghans build a stable representative state able to defend itself. And we must do what it takes to prevail. The stakes are very high.
On the U.S. defense budget and federal spending:
We need to go back to fiscal discipline and unfortunately that has not been the view of the current Administration. They're spending everywhere and with disregard for deficits and debts and our future economic competitiveness. Though we are engaged in two wars and face a diverse array of threats, it is the DEFENSE budget that has seen significant program cuts and has actually been reduced from current levels!
First, the Defense Department received only ½ of 1 % of the nearly trillion dollar Stimulus Package funding -- even though many military projects fit the definition of "shovel-ready." In this Administration's first defense budget request for 2010, important programs were reduced or cancelled. As the threat of ballistic missiles from countries like North Korea and Iran grow, missile defense was slashed.
On the Chinese military:
China has some 1000 missiles aimed at Taiwan and no serious observer believes Taiwan poses a military threat to Beijing. Those same Chinese forces make our friends in Japan and Australia nervous. China provides support for some of the world's most questionable regimes from Sudan to Burma to Zimbabwe. China's military buildup raises concerns from Delhi to Tokyo because it has taken place in the absence of any discernable external threat.
China, along with Russia, has repeatedly undermined efforts to impose tougher sanctions on Iran for its defiance of the international community in pursuing its nuclear program. The Chinese food and product safety record has raised alarms from East Asia and Europe to the United States. And, domestic incidents of unrest -- from the protests of Uighurs and Tibetans, to Chinese workers throughout the country rightfully make us nervous.
On democracy and human rights:
I am not talking about some U.S.-led "democracy crusade." We cannot impose our values on other counties. Nor should we seek to. But the ideas of freedom, liberty and respect for human rights are not U.S. ideas, they are much more than that.
Amusing that she quotes numbers like 1/2 of 1% of nearly 1 trillion dollars. Apparently she can't do math, like 1% of 1 trillion being 10 billion. Half that and the military gets 5 billion from the stimulus alone, completely ignoring the amount that is part of the budget anyway.
Apparently she also hasn't read the news over the past week, the current Japanese government is rumored to be seeking closer ties to China and I imagine that Japan really couldn't care less what happens to Taiwan anyway.
Lastly the former governor appears to be suffering from memory loss, particularly that one of the biggest cuts was the F-22s which her former running mate McCain also wanted cut.
is the fact that there is no way on this earth that she actually wrote or even contributed to all of that. Whether or not you agree with the substance, Sarah Palin does not have the education, intelligence, or curiosity to think much less articulate such concepts. Whoever is helping her appear legitimate needs to be exposed and shamed.
to Hans,
I suppose you think Obama writes all his own speeches, or for that matter Presidents or leaders of any country or state on this planet writes their own words. They are all actors from the left and the right from communist, socialist or democratic countries. The Greeks perfected rhetoric to go with the idea that people should have a say in how they are governed. It is the art of not getting trapped by your own words (that other people write for you)while convincing others that you know best how to govern or make rules that are good for all. Socrates pinned these new democrats with their own words by simply asking questions for clarity on what they were trying to say. They couldn't do this without exposing the fact that they couldn't really back up their positions with the truth...... only with some more rhetoric (b.s.). And you know what happened to Socrates....
While I don't think your examples are the best I have to agree on the main point. Mr. Obama is certainly a fine orator, but I doubt he writes every speech himself (though reportedly his 2004 address was). The point isn't so much about whether a politician is capable of writing their own speeches as much as whether that politician can present it well.
Maybe she didn't wrote this speech herself (and her previous speeches on TV make us believe so), but she sounds very reasonable. I wonder if she would say the same things were McCain elected and she got the job.
Obama has also promised more respect for human rights, criticized McCain and his party friends over helping some dictatorial regimes, but look at him now, whatta shame! Obama supports (at least passively) dictators even more than Bush did.
Palin, on the other hand, is at least voicing support for such ideas like universal human rights and freedom.
It's not a matter of whether she literally wrote the speech,
it's matter of whether she formulated the ideas behind it. I seriously, seriously doubt it. And that is scary.
Only after the election did the Republican Fox Channel reveal that Palin got countries and continents mixed up, as if that's much of a surprise. So if in a sort of Jeopardy game with average high school students Palin would likely come in dead last.
It's a sad comment on that banking firm that invited her that she can repeat some words that sound half intelligent but she could never take questions and give reasonable answers. Is this firm part of the vast Neo-Con plan for 'the new World Order?" The same bunch that started the Iraq War? In last fall's debates she carefully repeated very general statements like a trained pet, and even then stumbled badly.
Pres. Obama and most Dem's can easily take questions and give intelligent answer's, whether you agree with them or not. Palin and the nasty nuts she attracts is a symptom of a hateful sickness in too much of the Republican Party.
Obama and team have already saved the US from another right wing depression, along with credit card and other reforms. They deserve some respect for that at the least.
How can anyone take your remarks about Palin seriously when you show your stupidity by supporting the economic policies of the Obama administration? These policies, along with his naivte belief that the Islamic Regrime in Iran can be trusted, will guarantee he follows in the footsteps of Jimmy Carter.
Josh Rogin reports on national security and foreign policy from the Pentagon to Foggy Bottom, the White House to Embassy Row, for The Cable.
Read More
(9)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE