Global News : Passport : Ricks : Drezner : Walt : Rothkopf : Lynch
The Cable : The AfPak Blog : Net Effect : Shadow Govt. : Madam Secretary : The Call
Obama administration anticipated Iran talks response
As Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Bill Burns arrived in Frankfurt for the next round of international talks on Iran's nuclear program, news reports Tuesday suggested Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad plans to respond to the Western offer for nuclear talks during a speech at the U.N. General Assembly due to take place the week of September 21 in New York.
Diplomatic sources tell The Cable that the Obama administration has recently said it saw signs that the Iranian government plans to issue some sort of response to the West's offer to engage on its nuclear program. But, diplomats said, the Obama administration anticipates that the response when tested will not prove meaningful, and is likely at most to only stretch for a short time an anticipated effort to start pushing for international sanctions in the coming weeks and months targeting Iran.
The Obama administration has given Iran until September 15 to respond to the talks offer, or face an increased international sanctions effort.
Reports from Tehran further said that Iran's chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili announced Tuesday that Iran "has prepared a new nuclear proposal and is ready to resume talks on its nuclear program." The reported Jalili announcement on Iranian state TV came as Iran's Supreme National Security Council met, a day before Washington, Britain, France, Germany, Russia, and China are due to hold the next round of the so-called P5+1 talks on Iran's nuclear program in Frankfurt Wednesday.
"We've seen these press reports that they're developing a new proposal," State Department spokesman Ian Kelly said at a press briefing Tuesday. "We have not received any proposal. We would review any proposal that they give us seriously, and in the spirit of mutual respect we would welcome the Iranian Government's constructive response to the P-5+1 to their April 2009 invitation to meet face-to-face."
Kelly later specified that Washington would consider a meaningful response from Tehran to be one that "that said 'we understand that we have certain obligations that we have to adhere to, and that they welcome a reengagement with us in the P-5+1 context to try and address some of these concerns that we have.'"
Burns is attending the talks accompanied by aide Elisa Catalano, a State Department senior advisor formerly assigned to office of Dennis Ross who is now serving as a liaison in Burns's office to the NSC. Diplomat David Bame and counselor Gamal Helal are still waiting to join Ross at the NSC, sources said, while Farsi speaking Iran expert Ray Takeyh is returning to the Council on Foreign Relations. It wasn't immediately clear if Ross or NSC senior director for Iran, Iraq and the Persian Gulf Puneet Talwar was also attending the Frankfurt talks with Burns.
"We hear rumors of a possible Iranian signal even before the Frankfurt P5+1 meeting" Wednesday, one Western diplomat said on condition of anonymity Tuesday. "State and NSC expect something from the Iranians at the U.N. General Assembly. But it won't be enough. ... They are smart enough to do something, to try to stretch the process a bit more."
There have been consultations between Washington, the British, French, and Germans in particular on possible further sanctions, the diplomat said. The Israelis were said to have seen the whole package of proposed possible international sanctions, which were described according to the diplomat as "big bang" sanctions. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in meetings last week in London and Germany, told western leaders the military option was not his preferred route, a second western official apprised of the discussions said. The implication, the second official said, was that there was growing Israeli confidence in the possible effectiveness of the anticipated sanctions plan.
Senior administration officials also confirmed to Western diplomats previous reports that the Obama administration did receive a letter from the Iranian government before its June 12 elections responding to a reported Obama letter offering negotiations. They were excited they had got a response, the diplomat said of the Obama administration, but said the letter itself was pretty disappointing. It did not get into anything of substance and had nothing to build on.
UPDATE: An Iranian newspaper is reporting that Obama has sent another letter to the Iranian authorities, reiterating the talks offer. No details on when the reported letter was sent were available, and the administration has declined to comment on the reports. Previously, asked about earlier alleged letter from the Iranian leadership to Obama, the administration said it declined to comment on private correspondence.






Takeyh will not go to the White House
Ross’s promotion and Takeyh’s eviction could be a sign that the political mood toward Iran is changing the momentum and prospects for friendly approaches with tha Mullahs are rapidly fainting. To better understand this change of mood, we should review how difficult was the nomination of Ross in the first place and we should also remember Takeyh’s attitude toward Iran.
In early 2009, some powerful circles (that rather engage Iran at any time, under any circumstances and at any price) launched a campaign to discredit Ross and make it hard for Obama to nominate him as the Iran envoy. Under pressure, Obama was forced to send Ross to the foggy bottom of State Department with a job title that was miles away from the initial designation of “Iran envoy”.
Then, Ross brought Ray Takeyh to his team, an Iran Expert whose specialty is to prove that at any given time, there are “moderates, pragmatists or realists” among Iranian leaders who want to reach an agreement with the US. All the US have to do is to be more generous and open mined toward the Mullahs.
Takeyh until early 2000s was an ardent opponent of engagement with Iran but surprisingly became a strong advocate of rapprochement policy. As a leading figure of the pro-engagement circles in the US, Takeyh has systematically and with no accountability distorted the reality of the Iranian political situation, selectively changed the facts and fabricated new ones.
With Ross’s promotion and Takeyh’s return to CFR, the Iranian community could express a sigh of relief. This is also a right step toward protecting US national security.
Re:
It is my understanding that Takeyh's return to CFR has more to do with Kafkaesque bureaucratic complications of getting people into the overstuffed NSC (office space, seriously, is a constraint, moving people in requires someone to move out in certain bureaus), and budget/administrative type issues, rather than anything ideological. So far, Ross has only been able to get one longtime assistant in to assist him at the NSC, and that is with Ross having been over there for several weeks.
How does the IAEA report
How does the IAEA report about Iran play into any of this. ElBaradai has just said that he feels the evidence against Iran is being "hyped" by some (ie. the US and Israel) and given he was right about Iraq, will the US have to rebut his statements or findings?
It seems to me we are making all the same mistakes we made with Iraq and even using the same sort of rhetoric without having to show *any* evidence that Iran is doing anything remotely similar to what they are being accused of doing.
Iran is not initiating a nuclear arms race in the Mid-East- Isreal has already done that. And the administration has been eerily silent about Saudi Arabia's proposed quest for nuclear capabilities. There is no consistency in this policy.
***************
Secretary Clinton Blog
Is this the same El Bradei
Is this the same El Bradei who just a while ago declared:
ElBaradei: Iran wants nuclear weapon technology
Updated: 2009-06-17 23:17
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2009-06/17/content_8295165.htm
LONDON - Iran wants the ability to build nuclear weapons to gain the reputation of a major power in the Middle East, the head of the UN nuclear watchdog said in a BBC interview broadcast on Wednesday.
Mohamed ElBaradei, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said Iran sees nuclear weapons as an "insurance policy" against perceived threats from neighboring countries or the United States.
"My gut feeling is that Iran definitely would like to have the technology ... that would enable it to have nuclear weapons if they decided to do so," ElBaradei told the BBC. "It wants to send a message to its neighbours, it wants to send a message to the rest of the world: yes, don't mess with us, we can have nuclear weapons if we want it.
"But the ultimate aim of Iran, as I understand it, is that they want to be recognised as a major power in the Middle East and they are.
"This is to them the road to get that recognition to power and prestige and ... an insurance policy against what they heard in the past about regime change, axis of evil."
In Vienna, the United States told a meeting of the IAEA's 35-nation governing body that Iran now appeared to be in the position to "weaponise" enrichment.
"Iran is now either very near or in possession of sufficient low-enriched uranium to produce one nuclear weapon, if the decision were made to (further) enrich it to weapons-grade," US envoy Geoffrey Pyatt said.
To do that, Iran would have to reconfigure its enrichment plant to yield bomb-ready nuclear fuel and miniaturise the material to fit into a warhead -- technical steps that could take from six months to a year or more, nuclear analysts say.
Ahmadinejad indicated on Sunday that there would be no change in nuclear policy during his second term, saying the issue "belongs in the past".
Pyatt said Iran's stonewalling since August 2008 of an IAEA investigation into US intelligence allegations that it researched atomic bomb design, and its curbs on UN inspections, "deeply undermines Iran's assertion that its nuclear programme is exclusively peaceful in nature".
Six countries, including European Union members Britain, France and Germany, have offered Iran economic and other incentives if it stops enriching uranium, a process that can make fuel for power plants or weapons.
Iran has not engaged the six-power offer and says its enrichment programme is a non-negotiable fait accompli.