Posted By Laura Rozen Share

Several Hill and Washington foreign policy hands say they are hearing from the White House that Paul Farmer is out as a candidate to lead USAID, a decision that was said to have been made at the White House. It wasn't clear what the reason was, and a representative of Farmer's group, Partners in Health, couldn't immediately be reached.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had sought White House permission to announce Farmer as the candidate to lead USAID when she appeared at the development agency last month, but said she wasn't given the nod to do so. She drew applause there and later in a speech at the Council on Foreign Relations complaining about the lengthy and excruciating vetting process for administration candidates.

Given his resume as a pioneering health care visionary who has worked to bring health care to the poor in Haiti, Peru and elsewhere often railing against conventional bureaucratic practices and doctrine, Farmer was said by an associate and an administration official to have been daunted by the vetting paperwork for the prospetive job, including a form requiring him to list every foreigner he had come into contact with the past several years. But it wasn't clear if Farmer ran into a snag clearing the vet, grew disillusioned with the prospective job over the process, or rather, was a victim of the complaints about the vetting process.

Some foreign policy hands have noted that for Farmer's visionary and inspiring career, the MacArthur genius, medical doctor and anthropologist wasn't necessarily an easy fit for running a large government bureaucracy. The White House didn't immediately respond to a query on the matter. One official said when Clinton discussed with the White House whether it would be possible to announce Farmer when she spoke at USAID last month, she was told there was an issue and that is what led to her public expression of frustration with the process.

 

HANSJ

12:47 PM ET

August 5, 2009

Thank God

Paul Farmer may be a nice man and a committed humanitarian, but nothing qualified him to be the USAID Administrator. They need to tap into the executive leadership of the development community--for-profit and non-profit--to build a leadership team. Like it or not, these are the people who know how the USAID "business" works, are the only ones who can see where change is needed, and have the management experience to tackle such a moribund agency.

 

DCF011

12:05 AM ET

August 15, 2009

I won't pretend to understand

I won't pretend to understand the inner workings of USAID, but I strongly disagree, regarding Farmer, that "Nothing qualified him to be the USAID Administrator."

Please remember Farmer founded and helps run a $60+ million NGO.

 

MAX J

3:44 PM ET

August 5, 2009

So sad

This is so sad for the development world and the Administration... so far I've seen NOTHING visionary out of the Clinton and Obama team on foreign aid--this one potential pick was the bright spot. Farmer may not be a bureaucratic genius but he is a development, health, and human rights genius and that's exactly what's needed to shake up this bureaucracy that's more beholden to contractors than to people living in poverty.

What's not needed: the same old ideas and ways of doing things from the "development community" that have made US aid so ineffective.

 

HANSJ

4:30 PM ET

August 5, 2009

So Sad?

It's wonderful that Farmer is a visionary. But that means nothing when it comes to managing much less reforming a sprawling bureaucracy. The best reformers know how a system operates before deciding how to reform. Knowing the "injustices" heaped upon the poor by USAID contracting isn't enough. He would be eaten alive.

 

RJJENSE

8:28 PM ET

August 5, 2009

Humanitarian (Nonzero Sum) Foreign Policy - A New Road Forward

I'm very interested in this discussion, and I wonder where this goes next. I think we should value a person with a vision for a better more diplomatic peaceful world. Idealism should be highly valued - and is imperative. However, it can't be allowed to completely rule a system. With that said, if the AID system is "mal-aligned" (ie. it is no longer effective in serving its design), then a new jolt of idealism may be just what is needed. Obviously the Obama administration and Clinton are interested in pursuing new ideas, especially if they have the potential to advance peace and "connectivity" in our globalizing world. We should strive for creating more effective nonzero-sum foreign policy, especially on the humanitarian front.

 

GARY H. JOHNSON JR.

7:26 PM ET

August 6, 2009

Who's Next?

I wonder if Isobel Coleman is in the running.

 

John Hudson reports on national security and foreign policy from the Pentagon to Foggy Bottom, the White House to Embassy Row, for The Cable.

Enter your email address to get The Cable delivered to your inbox each night:

Delivered by FeedBurner