Thursday, June 4, 2009 - 2:21 PM

Who advised President Barack Obama on the big speech?
"Over the weekend, White House officials hosted a group of Muslim and other foreign policy scholars to discuss what points Mr. Obama should touch on," Politico's Mike Allen reports in Playbook.
The New York Times details: Ghaith Al-Omari from the American Task Force on Palestine, Carnegie Endowment's Karim Sadjadpour, Iran expert Vali Nasr, who's been working for Holbrooke, and Brookings' Shibley Telhami, who's been all over the airwaves incidentally commenting on the speech:
On the Friday afternoon before the Memorial Day weekend, White House officials hosted a group of Muslim and other foreign policy scholars to discuss what points Mr. Obama should touch on. The meeting was organized by Michael McFaul, the White House senior adviser for Russia, who arranged it under his purview as a senior democracy adviser. Other White House officials in the 90-minute meeting included the National Security Council officials Mara Rudman, Dan Shapiro, Denis McDonough and Ben Rhodes.
On the other side of the table were Karim Sadjadpour, an
Iranian-American expert from the Carnegie Endowment, Ghaith Al-Omari, a former Palestinian peace negotiator, Vali Nasr, another Iran expert who is soon to join the Obama administration, and Shibley Telhami, a senior fellow at the Saban Center for Middle East Policy, who described for the assembled officials the results of polling in the Middle East about attitudes toward the United States, according to people in the meeting.
Those who consulted the NSC on the speech were asked by the NSC not to comment on the meeting, Al-Omari said.
How'd Obama do? That will be worked over for days by the speech's various audiences. But Al-Omari's colleague Hussein Ibish, a senior fellow at the American Task Force for Palestine, was bowled over: "President Obama deservedly received a standing ovation from his audience at Cairo University today, after delivering a pitch-perfect and inspiring speech to the Arab and Muslim peoples," Ibish wrote on his blog. "The President's words were especially significant ... with regard to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, bluntly stating 'it is time for us to act on what everyone knows to be true,' which is that it is in 'Israel's interest, Palestine's interest, American interests and the world's interests' to achieve an agreement between Israel and the Palestinians that allows for the creation of a Palestinian state.'"
"The speech was nothing short of spectacular," says Alan Pinkas, the former consul general of the Israeli mission to the United Nations in New York, and director of Rabin Center for Tolerance at Bar Ilan University. "Coherent, lucid, balanced and smart. It's been a long long time, maybe since JFK, that an American President delivered a speech of such magnitude and scope."
"President Obama's blunt, honest address in Cairo was absolutely critical in signaling a new era of understanding with Muslim communities worldwide," reacted Sen. John Kerry (D-MA), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, in a statement. "He shattered stereotypes on both sides, reminded the west and the Muslim world of our responsibilities, and reaffirmed one of America's highest ideals and traditional roles -- that those who seek freedom and democracy, Muslim and non-Muslim alike, have no greater friend than the United States of America. ... In addressing these challenges directly, President Obama has created an historic opportunity to find a new beginning."
"I was pleased the President articulated clearly the responsibilities of all the regional parties to create an environment conducive to viable negotiations toward a two-state solution for Israel and the Palestinians," Congresswoman Nita Lowey (D-NY), chairwoman of the all-important State and Foreign Operations Appropriations Subcommittee, said in a statement, going on to signal her belief that it shouldn't be only Israel being pressured. "While compromise will be required on both sides, the Palestinians and Arab states must unequivocally denounce terrorism, recognize Israel, cease anti-Israel incitement at home and within the United Nations, and support viable PA institutions."
More analysis of the speech from my FP colleague Marc Lynch.
AUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images
President Obama could not have delivered a better speech to the Muslim world. He not only addressed the most important issues dividing Muslims and the US but, more broadly, addressed the spirit of the divide by acknowledging the differences and similarities that are often overlooked on both sides. And he crowned it off by NOT visiting Israel while in the region--a subtle yet powerful gesture. There will be people who will be unhappy just because he did it, but on the whole it was an important first step. Well done.
President Obama’s Speech in Cairo, Egypt: Iran
Following President Obama’s speech in Cairo, Egypt, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Spiritual Leader of Iran, released a pre-recorded message. It insisted that development of nuclear bomb is forbidden under Iran's brand of Islam. He reiterated that Iran seeks only to generate electricity. He referred to a religious edict, or fatwa that he had issued at least four years ago in which he declared that the production, stockpiling or use of nuclear weapons was prohibited under Islam.
Khamenei said: "Our nation says we want to have a nuclear industry". "We want to use nuclear energy in a peaceful way. However, the West and America say that the Iranian nation is seeking to make a nuclear bomb. Why are they telling lies?"
"The Iranian government and nation have repeatedly said that we do not want nuclear weapons. We have announced that according to Islamic principles, the use of nuclear weapons is forbidden. It is dangerous to keep nuclear weapons. We are not seeking to have them. We do not want them."
The text of the President's speech was not broadcasted by radios or TVs in Iran. This was a mistake by the Iranian government not to allow the broadcast; but it will be available on the internet. Iranian people have the right to know the entire text of the President's speech. The influence of the President Obama’s speech on the Iranian election for the office of the president of Iran would be of great interest.
I think we need it most in times of recession.Financial crisis affect the health of people so it does bring impact to the concern of government.The financial crisis has taught us a lot. One of the things the financial crisis has taught us is that even giants can fall, and even though he lives down the street, the local banker cares more for a balance sheet than anyone's household. It's been a terrifying ride, and hopefully the whole thing will be back up faster than the fastest rapid payday loans. The financial crunch has put a hurting on many industries and millions of people, and the lessons to be learned for the future are legion. There are now record numbers of people running for payday loans because of unreliable banks during the financial crisis.
In reference to the denial by Iranian president Ahmadinejad that holocaust ever happened, President Obama said in Germany that ’he does NOT have patience with people who would deny history’. Here is some history that President should know and NOT deny either.
The political arm of Islam has been waging terroristic holy war on the rest of the world for centuries. It has waged this war against civilizations that have nothing to do with the West, let alone America. This is why the case of Muslim aggression against India proves so much.
Medieval India, before the Muslim invasions, was a richly imaginative culture, one of the half-dozen most advanced civilizations of all time. Muslim invaders began entering India in the early 8th century, on the orders of Hajjaj, the governor of what is now Iraq. In the aftermath of the Muslim invasions of India from 8th to 11th centuries, in the ancient cities of Varanasi, Mathura, Ujjain, Maheshwar, Jwalamukhi, and Dwarka, not one temple survived whole and intact. This is the equivalent of an army marching into Paris and Rome, Florence and Oxford, and razing their architectural treasures to the ground.
In his book The Story of Civilization, famous historian Will Durant lamented the results of what he termed "probably the bloodiest story in history." He called it "a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians invading from without and multiplying from within. Muslim invaders "broke and burned everything beautiful they came across in Hindustan," displaying the resentment of the less developed warriors who felt intimidated in the encounter with "a more refined culture." The Muslim Sultans built mosques at the sites of torn down temples, and many Hindus were sold into slavery. As far as they were concerned, Hindus were kafirs, heathens, par excellence. They, and to a lesser extent the peaceful Buddhists, were, unlike Christians and Jews, not "of the book" but at the receiving end of Muhammad’s injunction against pagans: "Kill those who join other gods wherever you may find them."
The massacres perpetrated by Muslims in India are unparalleled in history. In sheer numbers, they are bigger than the Jewish Holocaust, the Soviet Terror, the Japanese massacres of the Chinese during WWII, Mao’s devastations of the Chinese peasantry, the massacres of the Armenians by the Turks, or any of the other famous crimes against humanity of the 20th Century. But sadly, they are almost unknown outside India. The perpetrators of these massacres were not military thugs disobeying the ethical teachings of their religion, as the European crusaders in the Holy Land were, but were actually doing precisely what their religion taught. As has been well-documented, jihad has been preached from the official centers of Islam, not just the lunatic fringe.
John Hudson reports on national security and foreign policy from the Pentagon to Foggy Bottom, the White House to Embassy Row, for The Cable.
(5)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE