Monday, April 13, 2009 - 3:08 PM
The Harvard Kennedy School has a mission to try to marry the worlds of academia and policy practice. So it's notable that former Harvard Kennedy School dean Joseph Nye takes to the oped pages of the Washington Post today to argue political science and international relations have become increasingly irrelevant to the policy sphere:
Some academics say that while the growing gap between theory and policy may have costs for policy, it has produced better social science theory, and that this is more important than whether such scholarship is relevant. ... But the danger is that academic theorizing will say more and more about less and less.
Worth watching whether this is Nye's parting warning shot against academic navel gazing before heading to Tokyo.
UPDATE: FP's Dan Drezner responds: "Joe Nye is right! Well, mostly right....:
That said, just to throw some sand in Nye's gears, I don't accept that this is only the academy's fault. Even when IR scholars try to speak with one loud voice, the result is often a deafening silence in the policy world.
As for individual scholars, the political barriers to government service by aspiring academics are pretty high at this point. Academics have long paper trails that are easy to manipulate, and politicians are well aware of this Achilles Heel. Exhibit A: the Obama administration's vetting process. Exhibit B: Harold H. Koh.
"SAYING MORE AND MORE ABOUT LESS AND LESS". How true that is, and the reasons are plain. The left is intimidate by the "politically correct" mafia. Never mind that your are not supposed to use racist words. You are only supposed to stay within the boundaries- anything else is seen as gauche, and will not be discussed. For example, compare "the difficulties were caused by the subprime lenders" to "the crash was caused by capitalism itself". Few intellectuals in academe would argue the latter, even though it clearly explains what happened. The right wing is unable to do anything but sloganeer--which is the enemy of rational thought. There is no analysis, no dialectics. Everything on either side of the political spectrum is cherry picked to support a position-- a good definition of propaganda. Americans consider it unpatriotic to speak more than English, and here's why; you can get news directly from other countries and see that things are not so simple. "America" is not always supreme and "capitalism" is not always the best system.
Interesting that neither Drezner or Walt have commented on the Nye piece as yet. The unworthy thought occurs that they may be hoping that most people don't read the Post on weekends and that Nye's argument will therefore be forgotten within days.
What's happening to Political Science and International relations happened to philosophy 80 years ago. When was the last time a political leader felt that bringing up the theories of a modern/classic philosoph would increase his political capital? Meanwhile, philosophers like Locke, Hobbes, and even Aldous Huxley played a direct hand in politics in policy in past eras. What does it mean? Who knows.
Josh Rogin reports on national security and foreign policy from the Pentagon to Foggy Bottom, the White House to Embassy Row, for The Cable.
Read More
(4)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE