Holbrooke had brief and cordial exchange with Iranian deputy foreign minister, Clinton says

Tue, 03/31/2009 - 10:16am

U.S. Special Representative to Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrooke held a "brief and cordial exchange" with the head of the Iranian delegation attending an international conference here at The Hague, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said at a press conference.

Clinton said that she did not have any direct contact with the Iranian delegation herself. But she said that at her request, a letter was passed to the Iranian government here today asking for assistance finding or gaining the release of three Americans held or believed missing in Iran, including former FBI officer Robert Levinson and U.S. journalist Roxana Saberi.

"During the course of the conference, representative Holbrooke held a brief and cordial exchange with the head of the Iranian delegation," Clinton said in answer to a question. She said the meeting was not "substantive."

At her direction, "A letter was delivered to Iran," Clinton added, saying it was one of two exchanges between the United States and Iran that had occurred here today. "In the letter, we asked Iran to use all its faciilties to ensure the safe and quick return of Robert Levinson, and the release and free travel of Roxana Saberi and" another Iranian American being held in Iran.

She later said the letter was handed over to the head of the Iranian delegation not by Holbrooke or herself, but by "a member of our extended delegation." She also said the letter, "seeking both information and assistance about our three American citizens," was not signed by her. "We hope to hear something positive," she said.

"I myself had no contact" with the Iranian delegation, Clinton added.

Iran is being represented at the "big tent" Afghanistan conference, which involves diplomats from 72 countries, by Deputy Foreign Minister Mohammed Mehdi Akhundzadeh.

In his speech to the conference, Akhundzadeh, dressed in a dark pin stripe suit and white Nehru collar shirt, outlined Iran's support for contributing to regional efforts to combat drug trafficking and improve security on the Iranian Afghan border.

“Welcoming the proposals for joint cooperation offered by the countries contributing to Afghanistan, the Islamic Republic of Iran is fully prepared to participate in the projects aimed at combating drug trafficking and the plans in line with developing and reconstructing Afghansitan,” the deputy foreign minister said.

He also described the U.S. and NATO miiltary mission in Afghanistan as "ineffective," arguing instead for the Afghanization of that nation's security. “The presence of foreign forces has not improved things in the country and it seems that an increase in the number of foreign forces will prove ineffective too," Akhundzadeh said. "The military expenses need to be redirected to the training of the Afghan police and Afghanization should lead the government building process.”

(British sources at the conference said Akhundzadeh had been a frequent interlocutor of the British over the years. A British newspaper report Monday said that Akhundzadeh had met with U.S. official Patrick Moon in Moscow last week under a Russian initiative to discuss international efforts to improve security in Afghanistan.)

 

Clinton spoke in a somewhat guarded but cautiously positive way about what she called the "Iranian intervention" at the conference, without naming the Iranian official who spoke and while trying to keep the focus on Afghanistan. "The U.S., Iran, and all the nations here today have a mutual interest in a stable and secure Afghanistan," Clinton said. "The intervention by the Iranian representative set forth clear ideas" on countering drug trafficking and improving border security that Clinton said the United States would listen to.

 

The State Department has previously downplayed the prospect of U.S. and Iranian discussions at the meeting. In advance of the conference, State Department spokesmen have repeatedly said that the Secretary had no plans for substantive meetings with Iranian officials here. The language seemed to leave room for unplanned or more casual meetings occurring, including with someone other than Secretary Clinton.

Holbrooke was cited earlier today by the AP calling US-Iran relations “a work in progress,” but he argued it made sense for Iran to be included at an international conference involving Afghanistan's neighbors. "How can you talk about Afghanistan and exclude one of the countries that is a ... neighboring state?" he said.

 

Earlier, a background briefing a senior U.S. official traveling with Clinton was planned to give to the press traveling with the State Department officials was canceled after reporters had waited an hour for it. They were told the official had been pulled into bilateral meetings.

 

By the time Clinton gave her public press briefing revealing Holbrooke's exchange with the head of the Iranian delegation, Holbrooke had apparently already departed the conference.

 

Clinton also said she had held bilateral meetings with the Dutch foreign minister who is hosting the conference, foreign minister of Pakistan, Afghan President Hamid Karzai, the foreign minister of Japan, and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. She heads to London tonight to meet up with President Obama, where they will attend the G-20 dialogue.



Advertisement

 

Talking to Iran without preconditions

Cheney must be grinding his teeth in a fury. How dare the US talk to people HE has declared his enemies? Does this mean there will be no war? FDR got us out of the depression with a war, what makes Obama think he can solve the capitalist made crisis without one? How dare they treat other countries as equals? I guess he will just have to enigeneer an attack, to make the Obama administration see the error of their ways.

Iran, key to peace

It will be very pleasing to see some definite statements in articles like this one in the very near future when some form of more formal meetings between Iran and the US get under way. Right now it appears as though it is important to mention as little as possible, to say a lot without saying anything.
It is just a matter of time and commitment from both sides to realise how important each country is to the other.
The most important activity in 2009, no doubt about this.

I agree with Rexw...

though I think expecting anything in 2009 is hoping for a bit much. Sanctions are still in place, after all, and Congress is still...Congress. Be that as it may, I'm still pleased with the developments, though I expect the new Israeli government will toss a spanner in the works at some point.

Maybe I'm wrong, but Israeli interests and American interests seem to coincide less and less these days.

Comment by papicek

If there is one thing we can be thankful for it is that the US and Israel interests coincide less.
It is a well established fact that Israel has controlled US middle east foreign policy. However the exposure over recent months thanks to the likes of Professor Walt and others in public forums and some newspaper articles, the amounts of what can only be called graft paid to Senators and Representatives from the Israeli lobby in its many guises, has had the result of making the US public somewhat more aware of this practice. It will continue, sadly, a little less obvious than before but when the US is able to break this largesse-generated relationship, and it will, middle east policy will move ahead in great strides, maybe not 2009, as you state, but before the end of 2010. Iran is very keen to be a serious contributor to this process and as the relationship moves forward it will make if even more difficult for the drum-thumping Israelis to try and frighten Iran into a second level postion as an Arab nation. Iran will not bow down to the twisted aims of Israel who really have no interest in middle east peace, a two nation solution or the return of Palestinian lands to the rightful owners. And now with the newly-elected war team, less likely than ever before. The US is going to have the strength to make it clear to Israel that the world is heartily sick of the whole mess.
Iran really is by far the most important country in the region.