ODNI inspector general reviewing Chas Freeman

Thu, 03/05/2009 - 6:25pm

In a letter today responding to 10 congressmen led by Rep. Mark Kirk (R-IL) who have raised concerns about the appointment of Chas Freeman to chair the National Intelligence Council, Edward Maguire, the inspector
general of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, has written
that he is reviewing the matters they have raised.

"We are examining the matters you have raised and will respond upon
completion," Maguire wrote (pdf).
 
In response, Kirk and Rep. Steven Israel (D-NY) wrote another letter to Maguire, asking him to examine Freeman's role on the board of directors of the Chinese National Offshore Oil Company, which is owned by the People's Republic of China. "Ambassador Freeman's service on the Board of Directors of a company owned by a foreign government seems to constitute an obvious conflict of interest -- especially given his service to a company owned by the People's Republic of China with significant investment in the Islamic Republic of Iran," congressmen Kirk and Israel wrote. "Your attention to whether Ambassador Freeman is an inappropriate candidate to participate in this independent review would be appreciated."
 
"The DNI welcomes the IG's review," said Wendy Morigi, director of public affairs for the ODNI. "In addition to the security clearance process and public financial disclosures, Director Blair believes that the IG report will put to rest any questions about Ambassador Freeman's suitability, character and financial history. He looks forward to Ambassador Freeman assuming his new role."

 



Advertisement

 

Chas Freeman

Since when did being involved in business become disqualifying for government service? Did Secretary of Treasury Paulson attract any attention from Congressman Kirk for his many commercial links to China through Goldman Sachs? I seem to have missed Kirk's demand for an IG investigation, notwithstanding Paulson's millions earned doing business with China prior to his leading U.S. efforts to advance our economic interests with China. And how about Sandy Randt -- Bush's frat brother and Hong Kong trade lawyer who served as Ambassador to China longer than any other U.S. ambassador to the PRC. Did Kirk question his credentials or objectivity? Or is this really all about Ambassador Freeman -- who helped open the door to China as Nixon's translator -- not being anti-China enough and pro-Israel enough for Kirk?
Paulson, Randt, and Freeman are all talented and loyal Americans, and Kirk's pathetic attempts to slime Freeman by falsely linking him to Iran -- via a Chinese company Freeman once advised -- is beneath contempt. The people of Chicago deserve better from a man who touts himself as a foreign policy sophisticate who once served on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.