Tuesday, January 20, 2009 - 12:28 AM
North Korea: "The risk of failure is... extraordinarily high"
It hasn't gotten as much attention in recent weeks as other global trouble spots, but North Korea will still be an agenda-topper for President Obama. But who will lead the U.S. delegation to the ongoing six-party talks? One possibility, sources told The Cable, is the official who had the job under President Bush: Amb. Chris Hill.
Former Clinton-era State Department counselor Wendy Sherman, a close Hillary Clinton advisor, had been under consideration for a dual role as Clinton counselor and U.S. rep. to the North Korea talks, and sources said the job was hers if she wanted it. But sources said she may not choose to go into the administration at this time, despite serving as one of the co-leads for the Obama transition team reviewing the State Department (Sherman did not respond to a query.)
North Korea experts say that if Sherman isn't interested in the job, other leading contenders aside from Hill are Frank Jannuzi, an East Asia specialist on the staff of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee who led the Korea team on Obama's campaign; former U.S. Korea envoy Charles L. "Jack" Pritchard; and Mitchell Reiss, a former head of State Department policy planning who is currently a dean at the College of William & Mary.
Reiss's prospects as a moderate Republican and ex-Bush appointee were unclear. "Mitchell [Reiss] is close to Gen. Colin Powell and served as a senior foreign policy advisor to Mitt Romney," said one Asia hand who served as an advisor to the Obama campaign who thought Reiss was a leading contender.
"I am not privy to the speculation," said Pritchard in an e-mail. "I expect I'll be at the Korea Policy Institute another year."
While U.S. policy to North Korea conducted through the established framework of the six party talks may have a lot of continuity with second term Bush policy, the job itself may be different than in the Bush era. The Obama transition has concluded "that it was a mistake for [Chris] Hill to serve both as EAP assistant secretary and rep to the six-party talks," said the former Obama campaign Asia hand. "Handling the North Korea nuclear negotiations is really a full-time job," and so the two positions will be separated (with Kurt Campbell taking the post of assistant secretary of state for East Asian affairs).
Said one of the discussed candidates for the Korea envoy job: "My view is one has to be smart enough to be offered the job, and dumb enough to take it. The risk of failure is extraordinarily high."
Then again, whoever takes the job will fare better than Hill did during the Bush administration, argued the Obama campaign hand: "The White House and State Department will be on the same page," the Asia hand said. "That immeasurably strengthens our diplomatic approach. Hill constantly had to look over his shoulder and was being undercut by the neocons and Cheney. ... He did as well as possible under the circumstances. The new [Korea envoy], whether Hill or someone else, will have a much easier time of it."
He interpreted recent rumblings from North Korea during the U.S. presidential transition as a somewhat predictable message that, "'We are important enough to be at the top of the president's national security agenda, and we are not willing to be subordinated.' .... If the president thought he was going to focus on Afghanistan and Iraq now and deal with North Korea later, Pyongyang is saying, 'No, they are dealing with us now.'"
Bonus Round:
I think it would be wise to keep Chris Hill on as the envoy if not the Asst Sec. First, critics cite that Hill was ineffective over the last three years. BUT the Bush Admin waited three years to open serious diplomatic and sort of alienated the N. Koreans in 01, though the blame for the breakdown of the agreed framework could be put on the N. Koreans too. If Hill stays on, the model would be building on progress instead of a new paradigm. Which brings me to number two. With a new admin. the N. Koreans are likely to think they can begin renegotiating and get a better deal out of Obama's admin because they stand in a stronger bargaining position than they did when the talks opened in 03. If Hill stays on it dampens the severity of that effect. Lastly, people say he bucked the admin so why would Obama want an insubordinate rep to the SPT. But here, the gripes Hill had with Bush were the same one's Obama had. In his arguments with the Bush admin, Hill and Obama were aligned. Keep him on.
Josh Rogin reports on national security and foreign policy from the Pentagon to Foggy Bottom, the White House to Embassy Row, for The Cable.
Read More
(1)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE